Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28573470›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

External quality assessment for molecular typing of Salmonella 2013-2015: performance of the European national public health reference laboratories.

M B F Jensen, S Schjørring, J T Björkman, M Torpdahl, E Litrup, E M Nielsen, T Niskanen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Co-occurrence of ST412mSystems · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Phenotypic and Genotypic Eligible Methods forFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M B F JensenUnit of Foodborne Infections, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen, Artillerivej 5, Denmark.
S SchjørringUnit of Foodborne Infections, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen, Artillerivej 5, Denmark.
J T BjörkmanUnit of Foodborne Infections, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen, Artillerivej 5, Denmark.
M TorpdahlUnit of Foodborne Infections, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen, Artillerivej 5, Denmark.
E LitrupUnit of Foodborne Infections, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen, Artillerivej 5, Denmark.
E M NielsenUnit of Foodborne Infections, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen, Artillerivej 5, Denmark. emn@ssi.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5349-7802
T NiskanenEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Granits väg 8, 171 65, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control FWC ECDC/2012/039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the results of three consecutive External Quality Assessments (EQAs) for molecular subtyping of Salmonella to assess the performance of the European national public health reference laboratories (NPHRLs). The EQA included the molecular typing methods used for European enhanced surveillance of human Salmonella infections: pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), including gel analysis by the use of the software BioNumerics, and 5-locus multiple locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) for serovar Typhimurium. The participation in the PFGE laboratory part was higher (27/35) than in the gel analysis (19/35) and MLVA (15/35), suggestive of the need for capacity building in methods requiring specialized equipment (MLVA) or software (gel analysis). The majority (25/27) of the participating NPHRLs produced inter-laboratory comparable PFGE gel(s). Two laboratories continued to produce low-quality gels and should have additional technical assistance in the future. In particular, two gel quality evaluation parameters, measuring "image acquisition and running conditions" and "bands", were identified to cause gel quality problems throughout the EQAs. Despite the high number of laboratories participating in the PFGE laboratory part, the participation in gel analysis was low, although increasing. In the MLVA part, the NPHRLs correctly assigned 96% (405/420) allelic profiles according to the nomenclature. In conclusion, the EQAs identified critical parameters for unsuccessful performance and helped to offer assistance to those laboratories that needed it most. The assessments supported the development of quality in molecular typing and promoted the harmonization of subtyping methods used for EU/EEA-wide surveillance of human Salmonella infections.

Indexed as

Laboratory Proficiency TestingElectrophoresis, Agar GelElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldEuropeHumansMinisatellite RepeatsMolecular TypingSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID28573470
PMCPMC5602099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.