ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2018
Branching process approach for epidemics in dynamic partnership network.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Staged HIV transmission and treatment in a dynamic model with long-term partnerships.Journal of mathematical biology · 2023Article
- Interventions targeting non-symptomatic cases can be important to prevent local outbreaks: SARS-CoV-2 as a case study.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- A Review of Using Mathematical Modeling to Improve Our Understanding of Bacteriophage, Bacteria, and Eukaryotic Interactions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Modelling digital and manual contact tracing for COVID-19. Are low uptakes and missed contacts deal-breakers?PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We study the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and other infectious diseases on a dynamic network by using a branching process approach. The nodes in the network represent the sexually active individuals, while connections represent sexual partnerships. This network is dynamic as partnerships are formed and broken over time and individuals enter and leave the sexually active population due to demography. We assume that individuals enter the sexually active network with a random number of partners, chosen according to a suitable distribution and that the maximal number of partners that an individual can have at a time is finite. We discuss two different branching process approximations for the initial stages of an outbreak of the STI. In the first approximation we ignore some dependencies between infected individuals. We compute the offspring mean of this approximating branching process and discuss its relation to the basic reproduction number [Formula: see text]. The second branching process approximation is asymptotically exact, but only defined if individuals can have at most one partner at a time. For this model we compute the probability of a minor outbreak of the epidemic starting with one or few initial cases. We illustrate complications caused by dependencies in the epidemic model by showing that if individuals have at most one partner at a time, the probabilities of extinction of the two approximating branching processes are different. This implies that ignoring dependencies in the epidemic model leads to a wrong prediction of the probability of a large outbreak. Finally, we analyse the first branching process approximation if the number of partners an individual can have at a given time is unbounded. In this model we show that the branching process approximation is asymptomatically exact as the population size goes to infinity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.