Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28573455›Full record

ReviewArchives of toxicology2017

Toxicology of silica nanoparticles: an update.

Sivakumar Murugadoss, Dominique Lison, Lode Godderis, Sybille Van Den Brule, Jan Mast, Frederic Brassinne, Noham Sebaihi, Peter H Hoet

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of toxicology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 180 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 501 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sivakumar MurugadossUnit for Lung Toxicology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, O&N1, Room: 07.702, box 706, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Dominique LisonLouvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (LTAP), Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier 52/B1.52.12, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Lode GodderisDepartment of Occupational, Environmental and Insurance Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 block d, box 7001, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Sybille Van Den BruleLouvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (LTAP), Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier 52/B1.52.12, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Jan MastEM-unit, Center for Veterinary and Agrochemical Studies and Research (CODA-CERVA), Groeselenberg 99, Uccle, 1180, Brussels, Belgium.
Frederic BrassinneEM-unit, Center for Veterinary and Agrochemical Studies and Research (CODA-CERVA), Groeselenberg 99, Uccle, 1180, Brussels, Belgium.
Noham SebaihiGeneral Quality and Safety, Metrology Department, National Standards, North Gate-Office 2A29, Bd du Roi Albert II, 16, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Peter H HoetUnit for Lung Toxicology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, O&N1, Room: 07.702, box 706, 3000, Louvain, Belgium. peter.hoet@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-6603
KU Leuven · BEUCLouvain · BEVeterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre · BE

Funding

Belspo; Belgian Research Action through Interdisciplinary Networks (Brain-Be) BR/154/A4/To2DeNano
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale production and use of amorphous silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) have increased the risk of human exposure to SiNPs, while their health effects remain unclear. In this review, scientific papers from 2010 to 2016 were systematically selected and sorted based on in vitro and in vivo studies: to provide an update on SiNPs toxicity and to address the knowledge gaps indicated in the review of Napierska (Part Fibre Toxicol 7:39, 2010). Toxicity of SiNPs in vitro is size, dose, and cell type dependent. SiNPs synthesized by wet route exhibited noticeably different biological effects compared to thermal route-based SiNPs. Amorphous SiNPs (particularly colloidal and stöber) induced toxicity via mechanisms similar to crystalline silica. In vivo, route of administration and physico-chemical properties of SiNPs influences the toxicokinetics. Adverse effects were mainly observed in acutely exposed animals, while no significant signs of toxicity were noted in chronically dosed animals. The correlation between in vitro and in vivo toxicity remains less well established mainly due to improper-unrealistic-dosing both in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, notwithstanding the multiple studies published in recent years, unambiguous linking of physico-chemical properties of SiNPs types to toxicity, bioavailability, or human health effects is not yet possible.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutophagyCell Culture TechniquesDNA DamageEndothelium, VascularHumansImmune SystemInhalation ExposureMutagenicity TestsNanoparticlesNeurotoxicity SyndromesOxidative StressSilicon DioxideToxicity TestsSilicon DioxideAmorphous silica nanoparticlesColloidalOxidative stressPyrogenicStöberToxicity

Identifiers

PMID28573455
PMCPMC5562771
OpenAlexW2621290312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.