ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2018
Reliability of trauma management videos on YouTube and their compliance with ATLS
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Didactic and Content Quality of Basic Life Support Videos on YouTube: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- YouTube as a source of information in cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 2020 AHA Resuscitation Guidelines.PeerJ · 2024Observational
- YouTube as a Source of Information in Trauma Management for ATLS (10th Edition) Guidelines: Evaluation of Trauma Management Videos on YouTube.Emergency medicine international · 2024Article
- [Development and validation of a checklist for evaluating videos for learning resuscitation measures].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022Article
- Epidural Catheterization in Obstetrics: A Checklist-Based Video Assessment of Free Available Video Material.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The Development of an Educational Video on Blood Pressure Measurement for Pharmacy Students.Advances in medical education and practice · 2021Article
- YouTube as an Educational Resource in Medical Education: a Scoping Review.Medical science educator · 2020Article
- Assessment of the Accuracy of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Videos in English on YouTube according to the 2015 AHA Resuscitation Guidelines.Emergency medicine international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn this study, the reliability of trauma management scenario videos (in English) on YouTube and their compliance with Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS
methodsThe search was conducted on February 15, 2016 by using the terms "assessment of trauma" and ''management of trauma''. All videos that were uploaded between January 2011 and June 2016 were viewed by two experienced emergency physicians. The data regarding the date of upload, the type of the uploader, duration of the video and view counts were recorded. The videos were categorized according to the video source and scores.
resultsThe search results yielded 880 videos. Eight hundred and thirteen videos were excluded by the researchers. The distribution of videos by years was found to be balanced. The scores of videos uploaded by an institution were determined to be higher compared to other groups (p = 0.003).
conclusionThe findings of this study display that trauma management videos on YouTube in the majority of cases are not reliable/compliant with ATLS-guidelines and can therefore not be recommended for educational purposes. These data may only be used in public education after making necessary arrangements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28573427What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.