Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28573394›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2017

Cancer risk among insulin users: comparing analogues with human insulin in the CARING five-country cohort study.

Anna But, Marie L De Bruin, Marloes T Bazelier, Vidar Hjellvik, Morten Andersen, Anssi Auvinen, Jakob Starup-Linde, Marjanka K Schmidt, Kari Furu, Frank de Vries and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Incident peptic ulcers and concomitant treatment of direct oral anticoagulants and oral bisphosphonates-a real-world cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. New Horizons: Next-Generation Insulin Analogues: Structural Principles and Clinical Goals.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Anna ButDepartment of Public Health Clinicum, University of Helsinki, Tukholmankatu 8B, P.O. Box 20, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. anna.but@helsinki.fi.
Marie L De BruinDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, the Netherlands. M.L.deBruin@uu.nl.
Marloes T BazelierDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Vidar HjellvikDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Morten AndersenCentre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anssi AuvinenDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Jakob Starup-LindeDepartment of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital THG, Aarhus, Denmark.
Marjanka K SchmidtDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Kari FuruDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Frank de VriesDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Øystein KarlstadDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Nils EkströmCentre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jari HaukkaDepartment of Public Health Clinicum, University of Helsinki, Tukholmankatu 8B, P.O. Box 20, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOUniversity of Helsinki · FIUtrecht University · NLAarhus University Hospital · DKKarolinska Institutet · SETampere University · FIThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

The European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP-7) Grant agreement number 282526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisThe aim of this work was to investigate the relationship between use of certain insulins and risk for cancer, when addressing the limitations and biases involved in previous studies.

methodsNational Health Registries from Denmark (1996-2010), Finland (1996-2011), Norway (2005-2010) and Sweden (2007-2012) and the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink database (1987-2013) were used to conduct a cohort study on new insulin users (N = 327,112). By using a common data model and semi-aggregate approach, we pooled individual-level records from five cohorts and applied Poisson regression models. For each of ten cancer sites studied, we estimated the rate ratios (RRs) by duration (≤0.5, 0.5-1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5, 5-6 and >6 years) of cumulative exposure to insulin glargine or insulin detemir relative to that of human insulin.

resultsA total of 21,390 cancer cases occurred during a mean follow-up of 4.6 years. No trend with cumulative treatment time for insulin glargine relative to human insulin was observed in risk for any of the ten studied cancer types. Of the 136 associations tested in the main analysis, only a few increased and decreased risks were found: among women, a higher risk was observed for colorectal (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.06, 2.25) and endometrial cancer (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.07, 2.94) for ≤0.5 years of treatment and for malignant melanoma for 2-3 years (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.02, 3.61) and 4-5 years (RR 3.55, 95% CI 1.68, 7.47]); among men, a lower risk was observed for pancreatic cancer for 2-3 years (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17, 0.66) and for liver cancer for 3-4 years (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14, 0.94) and >6 years (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05, 0.92). Comparisons of insulin detemir with human insulin also showed no consistent differences. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationThe present multi-country study found no evidence of consistent differences in risk for ten cancers for insulin glargine or insulin detemir use compared with human insulin, at follow-up exceeding 5 years.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin DetemirInsulin GlargineMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRegression AnalysisYoung AdultHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin DetemirInsulin GlargineCancer riskCohort studyCommon data modelCumulative treatment timeDetemirGlargineHuman insulinInsulin analoguesNew insulin userPoisson modelRate ratioSemi-aggregateSite-specific

Identifiers

PMID28573394
PMCPMC5552833
OpenAlexW2620669290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.