ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2017
3D Microfabricated Scaffolds and Microfluidic Devices for Ocular Surface Replacement: a Review.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Step-Ladder Bioprinting to Align Collagen Fibers for Anisotropic Tissue Fabrication.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Bridging Preclinical and Clinical Gaps in Ocular Therapeutics: Hydrogel Drug Delivery and 3D Tissue Models.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for dry eye disease: principles, progress, and challenges.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Current microfluidic platforms for reverse engineering of cornea.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Biomechanical analysis of ocular diseases and its in vitro study methods.Biomedical engineering online · 2022Review
- Current Insights Into 3D Bioprinting: An Advanced Approach for Eye Tissue Regeneration.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Corneal Stem Cells as a Source of Regenerative Cell-Based Therapy.Stem cells international · 2020Review
- Corneal Repair and Regeneration: Current Concepts and Future Directions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Special Issue: Organs-on-Chips & 3D-Bioprinting Technologies for Personalized Medicine.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, there has been increased research interest in generating corneal substitutes, either for use in the clinic or as in vitro corneal models. The advancement of 3D microfabrication technologies has allowed the reconstruction of the native microarchitecture that controls epithelial cell adhesion, migration and differentiation. In addition, such technology has allowed the inclusion of a dynamic fluid flow that better mimics the physiology of the native cornea. We review the latest innovative products in development in this field, from 3D microfabricated hydrogels to microfluidic devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.