ReviewDer Internist2017
[Antibiotic Stewardship 2.0. Individualization of therapy].
Review in Der Internist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Antibiotic stewardship (ABS). Part 2: Application].Der Internist · 2020Article
- The role of mass spectrometry in antibiotic stewardship.Clinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.) · 2019Review
- Bacterial sepsis : Diagnostics and calculated antibiotic therapy.Der Anaesthesist · 2019Review
- [Adequate anti-infective treatment : Importance of individual dosing and application].Der Anaesthesist · 2018Review
- [Bacterial sepsis : Diagnostics and calculated antibiotic therapy].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance is a part of bacterial evolution and therefore unavoidable. In the context of missing novel treatment options, the restrictive use of available antibiotics in order to decelerate the spread of resistance is of high importance. This is the aim of Antibiotic Stewardship (ABS). ABS consists of two sides: a structural one and an individual one. The former deals with the formation of ABS teams, the analysis of antibiotic usage and resistance development, and the implementation of certain measures to improve antibiotic use; the latter is reflected by concrete bedside decisions: How can (broad) spectrum antibiotics be spared without harming the patient? This can be achieved, for example, by de-escalation, limiting duration of treatment, and avoiding nonindicated use. Typical nonindicated uses in both in- and outpatients are viral respiratory tract infections, asymptomatic bacteriuria and nonbacterial exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Furthermore, respiratory colonization in ventilated patients, ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis, "prolonged" perioperative prophylaxis, and contaminated blood cultures reflect situations where antibiotics should be avoided. In the future, ABS will benefit from accelerated pathogen and resistance detection because early adequate treatment not only lowers the usage of antibiotics but can also improve patient outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.