Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28573356›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2017

Active involved community partnerships: co-creating implementation infrastructure for getting to and sustaining social impact.

Renée I Boothroyd, Aprille Y Flint, A Mark Lapiz, Sheryl Lyons, Karen Lofts Jarboe, William A Aldridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Scaling up Evidence-Based Interventions in US Public Systems to Prevent Behavioral Health Problems: Challenges and Opportunities.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Renée I BoothroydFrank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 8180, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-8180, USA. renee.boothroyd@unc.edu.
Aprille Y FlintChild and Family Policy Institute of California, Sacramento, CA, USA.
A Mark LapizSocial Services Agency, County of Santa Clara, San Jose, CA, USA.
Sheryl LyonsDepartment of Health and Human Services, County of Humboldt, Eureka, CA, USA.
Karen Lofts JarboeChild and Family Policy Institute of California, Sacramento, CA, USA.
William A AldridgeFrank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 8180, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-8180, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active involved community partnerships (AICPs) are essential to co-create implementation infrastructure and translate evidence into real-world practice. Across varied forms, AICPs cultivate community and tribal members as agents of change, blending research and organizational knowledge with relationships, context, culture, and local wisdom. Unlike selective engagement, AICPs enable active involvement of partners in the ongoing process of implementation and sustainability. This includes defining the problem, developing solutions, detecting practice changes, aligning organizational supports, and nurturing shared responsibility, accountability, and ownership for implementation. This paper builds on previously established active implementation and scaling functions by outlining key AICP functions to close the research-practice gap. Part of a federal initiative, California Partners for Permanency (CAPP) integrated AICP functions for implementation and system change to reduce disproportionality and disparities in long-term foster care. This paper outlines their experience defining and embedding five AICP functions: (1) relationship-building; (2) addressing system barriers; (3) establishing culturally relevant supports and services; (4) meaningful involvement in implementation; and (5) ongoing communication and feedback for continuous improvement. Planning for social impact requires the integration of AICP with other active implementation and scaling functions. Through concrete examples, authors bring multilevel AICP roles to life and discuss implications for implementation research and practice.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationSocial ChangeCommunicationCultureFeedbackFoster Home CareHealth Plan ImplementationHumansLeadershipProgram DevelopmentCommunityImplementationPartnershipSustainabilityTribes

Identifiers

PMID28573356
PMCPMC5645286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.