GuidelineDer Anaesthesist2017
[Preoperative evaluation of adult patients before elective, noncardiothoracic surgery : Joint recommendation of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, the German Society of Surgery, and the German Society of Internal Medicine].
Guideline in Der Anaesthesist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- [Coagulation diagnostics in the clinical routine-Part 1 : Evaluation of the risk of bleeding before surgery, interventions and diagnostics in bleeding diathesis].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Optimized perioperative management (fast-track, ERAS) to enhance postoperative recovery in elective colorectal surgery.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2022Review
- [Operation preparation in trauma surgery].Der Unfallchirurg · 2021Article
- [Treatment of diabetes mellitus in perioperative medicine-an update].Der Anaesthesist · 2021Review
- [Perioperative stroke].Der Anaesthesist · 2021Review
- [The unrecognized danger].Der Anaesthesist · 2021Article
- [Missing frailty-missing the point.]Der Anaesthesist · 2020Article
- [Summary of the S3 guideline on abdominal aortic aneurysm from an anesthesiological perspective].Der Anaesthesist · 2020Review
- [67-year-old female before extended gastrectomy for antral cancer : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 36].Der Anaesthesist · 2019Article
- [Perioperative cardiovasular morbidity and mortality in noncardiac surgical interventions : Measures for optimal anesthesiological care].Der Anaesthesist · 2019Review
- [Anesthesia in gastrointestinal endoscopy: peroral endoscopic myotomy].Der Anaesthesist · 2019Review
- [70-year-old male with more than 40 pack years scheduled for implant removal : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: Part 1].Der Anaesthesist · 2019Article
- [63-year-old male with nodule in the left upper lobe : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: Part 20].Der Anaesthesist · 2019Article
- [74-year-old female for a low anterior rectal resection : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: Part 3].Der Anaesthesist · 2019Article
- [Preconditioning prior to visceral oncological surgery : A paradigm shift in visceral surgery?]Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018Review
- [Special situations of preconditioning and prehabilitation in oncological visceral surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018Review
- [Analysis and options for optimization of preoperative assessment for anesthesia at a university hospital].Der Anaesthesist · 2018Article
- [Choosing wisely in anesthesia : An important step in quality optimization].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluation of the patient's medical history and a physical examination are the cornerstones of risk assessment prior to elective surgery and may help to optimize the patient's preoperative medical condition and to guide perioperative management. Whether the performance of additional technical tests (e. g. blood chemistry, ECG, spirometry, chest x‑ray) can contribute to a reduction of perioperative risk is often not very well known or is controversial. Similarly, there is considerable uncertainty among anesthesiologists, internists and surgeons with respect to the perioperative management of the patient's long-term medication. Therefore, the German Scientific Societies of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), Internal Medicine (DGIM) and Surgery (DGCH) have joined to elaborate recommendations on the preoperative evaluation of adult patients prior to elective, noncardiothoracic surgery, which were initially published in 2010. These recommendations have now been updated based on the current literature and existing international guidelines. In the first part the general principles of preoperative evaluation are described (part A). The current concepts for extended evaluation of patients with known or suspected major cardiovascular disease are presented in part B. Finally, the perioperative management of patients' long-term medication is discussed (part C). The concepts proposed in these interdisciplinary recommendations endorsed by the DGAI, DGIM and DGCH provide a common basis for a structured preoperative risk assessment and management. These recommendations aim to ensure that surgical patients undergo a rational preoperative assessment and at the same time to avoid unnecessary, costly and potentially dangerous testing. The joint recommendations reflect the current state-of-the-art knowledge as well as expert opinions because scientific-based evidence is not always available. These recommendations will be subject to regular re-evaluation and updating when new validated evidence becomes available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28573343What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.