ArticleClinical neuroradiology2018
Retrieval of Migrated Volume Coils Using Different Clot Retrievers in a Porcine Model.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rescue Maneuver of Migrated Coil Using the ERIC Device after Previous Attempts with Conventional Stentrievers.Neurointervention · 2021Article
- Rescue of migrated Woven Endobridge devices using a stent-retriever-technique in a porcine model.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDuring endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using coils, migration is a serious complication that increases neurological morbidity. The aim of this experimental study was to assess the effectiveness and complications of retrieving volume coils with different, currently available clot retrievers in a porcine model.
methodsVolume coils of three-dimensional (3D) shape and different sizes were placed in the axillary artery of pigs. By means of 4 different clot retrievers (Trevo ProVue; Solitaire FR; 3D-Separator; ERIC) a total of 40 retrieval maneuvers (10 per retriever) were performed by deploying the retrievers within the migrated coils and trying to trap parts of the coils by advancing the microcatheter. Retrieval rates, retrieval duration, retrieval attempts, and complications were assessed.
resultsOverall coil retrieval was successful in 31 of 40 cases (77.5%). Retrieval rates using the Trevo ProVue (9/10), Solitaire FR (8/10), and the 3D-Separator (9/10) were higher than when using the ERIC (5/10). Duration of retrieval and retrieval attempts were significantly higher using the ERIC (p < 0.05). Complications like inadvertent deployment were only observed in one case using the Solitaire FR. Additional entrapment of the coil-retriever complex at the intermediate catheter was seen in 9 cases (22.5%). There was no case of vasospasm, perforation, or dissection.
conclusionsRetrieval of migrated volume coils using new-generation clot retrievers is a feasible and effective method. Retrieval rates and duration with the Trevo ProVue, Solitaire FR, and 3D-Separator are superior when compared to the ERIC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.