Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28573175›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2017

Lubiprostone improves visualization of small bowel for capsule endoscopy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled 2-way crossover study.

Mizue Matsuura, Masahiko Inamori, Yumi Inou, Kenji Kanoshima, Takuma Higurashi, Hidenori Ohkubo, Hiroshi Iida, Hiroki Endo, Takashi Nonaka, Akihiko Kusakabe and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mizue MatsuuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine.
Masahiko InamoriOffice of Postgraduate Medical Education, Yokohama City University Hospital.
Yumi InouDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine.
Kenji KanoshimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine.
Takuma HigurashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine.
Hidenori OhkuboDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine.
Hiroshi IidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine.
Hiroki EndoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine.
Takashi NonakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine.
Akihiko KusakabeDepartment of General Medicine, Yokohama City University School of Medicine.
Shin MaedaOffice of Postgraduate Medical Education, Yokohama City University Hospital.
Atsushi NakajimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine.
Yokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsLubiprostone has been reported to be an anti-constipation drug. The aim of the study was to investigate the usefulness of lubiprostone both for bowel preparation and as a propulsive agent in small bowel endoscopy. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover study of subjects who volunteered to undergo capsule endoscopy (CE). A total of 20 subjects (16 male and 4 female volunteers) were randomly assigned to receive a 24-μg tablet of lubiprostone 120 minutes prior to capsule ingestion for CE (L regimen), or a placebo tablet 120 minutes prior to capsule ingestion for CE (P regimen). Main outcome was gastric transit time (GTT) and small-bowel transit time (SBTT). Secondary outcome was adequacy of small-bowel cleansing and the fluid score in the small bowel. The quality of the capsule endoscopic images and fluid in the small bowel were assessed on 5-point scale.

resultsThe capsule passed into the small bowel in all cases. Median GTT was 57.3 (3 - 221) minutes for the P regimen and 61.3 (10 - 218) minutes for the L regimen (

conclusionOur study showed that use of lubiprostone prior to CE significantly improved visualization of the small bowel during CE as a result of inducing fluid secretion into the small bowel.

Identifiers

PMID28573175
PMCPMC5451284
OpenAlexW2621254792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.