Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28573134›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2017

High-Fat and Fat-Enriched Diets Impair the Benefits of Moderate Physical Training in the Aorta and the Heart in Rats.

Cleverson Rodrigues Fernandes, Vinicius Kannen, Karina Magalhães Mata, Fernando Tadeu Frajacomo, Alceu Afonso Jordão Junior, Bianca Gasparotto, Juliana Yumi Sakita, Jorge Elias Junior, Daphne Santoro Leonardi, Fernando Marum Mauad and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cleverson Rodrigues FernandesDepartment of Pathology, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Vinicius KannenDepartment of Toxicology, Bromatology, and Clinical Analysis, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Karina Magalhães MataDepartment of Pathology, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Fernando Tadeu FrajacomoDepartment of Pathology, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Alceu Afonso Jordão JuniorDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Bianca GasparottoDepartment of Toxicology, Bromatology, and Clinical Analysis, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Juliana Yumi SakitaDepartment of Toxicology, Bromatology, and Clinical Analysis, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Jorge Elias JuniorDivision of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Daphne Santoro LeonardiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Fernando Marum MauadDivision of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Simone Gusmão RamosDepartment of Pathology, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Sergio Akira UyemuraDepartment of Toxicology, Bromatology, and Clinical Analysis, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Sergio Britto GarciaDepartment of Pathology, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimMillions of people die each year due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). A Western lifestyle not only fuses a significant intake of fat with physical inactivity and obesity but also promotes CVD. Recent evidence suggests that dietary fat intake impairs the benefits of physical training. We investigated whether aerobic training could reverse the adverse effects of a high-fat diet (HFD) on the aorta. Then, we explored whether this type of exercise could reverse the damage to the heart that is imposed by fat-enriched diet (FED).

methodsRats were randomly assigned to two experiments, which lasted 8 weeks each. First, rats swam for 60 min and were fed either a regular diet [standard diet (STD)] or an HFD. After aortic samples had been collected, the rats underwent a histopathological analysis for different biomarkers. Another experiment subjected rats that were fed either an STD or an FED to swimming for 20 or 90 min.

resultsThe first experiment revealed that rats that were subjected to an HFD-endured increased oxidative damage in the aorta that exercises could not counteract. Together with increased cyclooxygenase 2 expression, an HFD in combination with physical training increased the number of macrophages. A reduction in collagen fibers with an increased number of positive α-actin cells and expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 occurred concomitantly. Upon analyzing the second experiment, we found that physically training rats that were given an FED for 90 min/day decreased the cardiac adipose tissue density, although it did not protect the heart from fat-induced oxidative damage. Even though the physical training lowered cholesterol levels that were promoted by the FED, the levels were still higher than those in the animals that were given an STD. Feeding rats an FED impaired the swimming protocol's effects on lowering triglyceride concentration. Additionally, exercise was unable to reverse the fat-induced deregulation in hepatic antioxidant and lipid peroxidation activities.

conclusionOur findings reveal that an increased intake of fat undermines the potential benefits of physical exercise on the heart and the aorta.

Indexed as

biochemistryblood vesselsheartobesityswimming

Identifiers

PMID28573134
PMCPMC5435813
OpenAlexW2616843774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.