Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28573000›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

Sex-specific association patterns in bonobos and chimpanzees reflect species differences in cooperation.

Martin Surbeck, Cédric Girard-Buttoz, Christophe Boesch, Catherine Crockford, Barbara Fruth, Gottfried Hohmann, Kevin E Langergraber, Klaus Zuberbühler, Roman M Wittig, Roger Mundry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Female Affiliation and Status in Semi-Free-Ranging Chimpanzees.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reproductive inequality among males in the genusPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Sex differences in cooperative coalitions: a mammalian perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Association patterns of female gorillas.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Characterization ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. The origins of human cumulative culture: from the foraging niche to collective intelligence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. The founder sociality hypothesis.Ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 8 countries.

Martin SurbeckDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2910-2927
Cédric Girard-ButtozDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Christophe BoeschDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Catherine CrockfordDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6597-5106
Barbara FruthLiverpool John Moores University, Faculty of Science, Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool, UK.
Gottfried HohmannDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Kevin E LangergraberSchool of Human Evolution & Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Klaus ZuberbühlerBudongo Conservation Field Station, Masindi, Uganda.
Roman M WittigDepartment of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Roger MundryMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEArizona State University · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FREvolutionary Genomics (United States) · USRoyal Zoological Society of Antwerp · BEUniversity of St Andrews · GBUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

European Research Council 283871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In several group-living species, individuals' social preferences are thought to be influenced by cooperation. For some societies with fission-fusion dynamics, sex-specific association patterns reflect sex differences in cooperation in within- and between-group contexts. In our study, we investigated this hypothesis further by comparing sex-specific association patterns in two closely related species, chimpanzees and bonobos, which differ in the level of between-group competition and in the degree to which sex and kinship influence dyadic cooperation. Here, we used long-term party composition data collected on five chimpanzee and two bonobo communities and assessed, for each individual of 10 years and older, the sex of its top associate and of all conspecifics with whom it associated more frequently than expected by chance. We found clear species differences in association patterns. While in all chimpanzee communities males and females associated more with same-sex partners, in bonobos males and females tended to associate preferentially with females, but the female association preference for other females is lower than in chimpanzees. Our results also show that, for bonobos (but not for chimpanzees), association patterns were predominantly driven by mother-offspring relationships. These species differences in association patterns reflect the high levels of male-male cooperation in chimpanzees and of mother-son cooperation in bonobos. Finally, female chimpanzees showed intense association with a few other females, and male chimpanzees showed more uniform association across males. In bonobos, the most differentiated associations were from males towards females. Chimpanzee male association patterns mirror fundamental human male social traits and, as in humans, may have evolved as a response to strong between-group competition. The lack of such a pattern in a closely related species with a lower degree of between-group competition further supports this notion.

Indexed as

competitionkinshipPan paniscusPan troglodytessexual segregationsociality

Identifiers

PMID28573000
PMCPMC5451801
OpenAlexW2610160290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.