Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28572990›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

Assessing the use of mobile phone data to describe recurrent mobility patterns in spatial epidemic models.

Cecilia Panigutti, Michele Tizzoni, Paolo Bajardi, Zbigniew Smoreda, Vittoria Colizza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Using Mobile Phone Data for Emergency Management: a Systematic Literature Review.Information systems frontiers : a journal of research and innovation · 2020
    Article
  19. Infectious Diseases Spreading on an Adaptive Metapopulation Network.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cecilia PaniguttiDipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Torino, via Giuria 1, Torino 10125, Italy.
Michele TizzoniISI Foundation, via Alassio 11/C, Torino 10126, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7246-2341
Paolo BajardiAizoon Technology Consulting, Str. del Lionetto 6, Torino, Italy.
Zbigniew SmoredaSociology and Economics of Networks and Services Department, Orange Laboratories, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Vittoria ColizzaSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP, UMR-S 1136), Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent availability of large-scale call detail record data has substantially improved our ability of quantifying human travel patterns with broad applications in epidemiology. Notwithstanding a number of successful case studies, previous works have shown that using different mobility data sources, such as mobile phone data or census surveys, to parametrize infectious disease models can generate divergent outcomes. Thus, it remains unclear to what extent epidemic modelling results may vary when using different proxies for human movements. Here, we systematically compare 658 000 simulated outbreaks generated with a spatially structured epidemic model based on two different human mobility networks: a commuting network of France extracted from mobile phone data and another extracted from a census survey. We compare epidemic patterns originating from all the 329 possible outbreak seed locations and identify the structural network properties of the seeding nodes that best predict spatial and temporal epidemic patterns to be alike. We find that similarity of simulated epidemics is significantly correlated to connectivity, traffic and population size of the seeding nodes, suggesting that the adequacy of mobile phone data for infectious disease models becomes higher when epidemics spread between highly connected and heavily populated locations, such as large urban areas.

Indexed as

epidemic modellinginfectious diseasesmobile phonesspatial epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID28572990
PMCPMC5451791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.