Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28572987›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

State anxiety and emotional face recognition in healthy volunteers.

Angela S Attwood, Kayleigh E Easey, Michael N Dalili, Andrew L Skinner, Andy Woods, Lana Crick, Elizabeth Ilett, Ian S Penton-Voak, Marcus R Munafò

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Emotion recognition bias depends on stimulus morphing strategy.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angela S AttwoodMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3696-4349
Kayleigh E EaseyMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Michael N DaliliMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Andrew L SkinnerMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7019-163X
Andy WoodsUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lana CrickUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Elizabeth IlettUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ian S Penton-VoakUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Marcus R MunafòMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/6Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High trait anxiety has been associated with detriments in emotional face processing. By contrast, relatively little is known about the effects of

Indexed as

7.5% carbon dioxideanxietyemotional face processingemotion recognitioninterpretation bias

Identifiers

PMID28572987
PMCPMC5451788
OpenAlexW2617164621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.