Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28572986›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

Social associations between California sea lions influence the use of a novel foraging ground.

Zachary A Schakner, Matthew B Petelle, Mathew J Tennis, Bjorn K Van der Leeuw, Robert T Stansell, Daniel T Blumstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Anthropogenic impacts at the interface of animal spatial and social behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. California sea lions interfere with striped marlin hunting behaviour in multi-species predator aggregations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. How does cognition shape social relationships?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zachary A SchaknerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8325-3526
Matthew B PetelleDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.
Mathew J TennisPacific States Marine Fisheries Commission, Astoria, OR 97103, USA.
Bjorn K Van der LeeuwFisheries Field Unit, US Army Corps of Engineers, Cascade Locks, OR 97014, USA.
Robert T StansellFisheries Field Unit, US Army Corps of Engineers, Cascade Locks, OR 97014, USA.
Daniel T BlumsteinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5793-9244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social relationships define an individual's position in its social network, which can influence the acquisition and spread of information and behavioural variants through the population. Thus, when nuisance behaviours spread through wildlife populations, identifying central individuals may provide valuable insights for problem-species management. We studied the effects of network position on California sea lion (

Indexed as

human–wildlife conflictnative invaderpinnipedssalmonid conservation

Identifiers

PMID28572986
PMCPMC5451787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.