ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017
Hybrid Performance of an Immortalized F
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consequences of ignoring dominance genetic effects from genomic selection model for discrete threshold traits.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multifactor Analysis of a Genome-Wide Selection System inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Serum Cystatin C and 90-Day Neurological Functional Prognosis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Insights from a Prospective Cohort and Mendelian Randomization.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Combined QTL mapping on bi-parental immortalized heterozygous populations to detect the genetic architecture on heterosis.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- A Secure High-Order Gene Interaction Detecting Method for Infectious Diseases.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Development of the maize 5.5K loci panel for genomic prediction through genotyping by target sequencing.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Exploring the gene pool of Brassica napus by genomics-based approaches.Plant biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Multi-omics-based prediction of hybrid performance in canola.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021Article
- Genomics Armed With Diversity Leads the Way inFrontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Impacts of dominance effects on genomic prediction of sorghum hybrid performance.Breeding science · 2020Article
- Investigating the evolution and development of biological complexity under the framework of epigenetics.Evolution & development · 2019Article
- A new genomic prediction method with additive-dominance effects in the least-squares framework.Heredity · 2018Article
- Effective Genomic Selection in a Narrow-Genepool Crop with Low-Density Markers: Asian Rapeseed as an Example.The plant genome · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomics-based prediction of hybrid performance promises to boost selection gain. The main goal of our study was to investigate the relevance of additive, dominance, and epistatic effects for determining hybrid seed yield in a biparental rapeseed population. We re-analyzed 60,000 SNP array and seed yield data points from an immortalized F
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.