Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28572602›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

In vivo imaging of uterine cervix with a Mueller polarimetric colposcope.

Jérémy Vizet, Jean Rehbinder, Stanislas Deby, Stéphane Roussel, André Nazac, Ranya Soufan, Catherine Genestie, Christine Haie-Meder, Hervé Fernandez, François Moreau and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Spatial frequency domain Mueller matrix imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jérémy VizetLPICM, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, Université Paris Saclay, Palaiseau, France.
Jean RehbinderLPICM, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, Université Paris Saclay, Palaiseau, France.
Stanislas DebyLPICM, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, Université Paris Saclay, Palaiseau, France.
Stéphane RousselLPICM, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, Université Paris Saclay, Palaiseau, France.
André NazacDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Ranya SoufanInstitut Gustave Roussy, Service d'anatomie pathologique gynécologique, Villejuif, France.
Catherine GenestieInstitut Gustave Roussy, Service d'anatomie pathologique gynécologique, Villejuif, France.
Christine Haie-MederInstitut Gustave Roussy, Service de Curiethérapie, Villejuif, France.
Hervé FernandezService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU de Bicêtre AP-HP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
François MoreauLPICM, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, Université Paris Saclay, Palaiseau, France.
Angelo PierangeloLPICM, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, Université Paris Saclay, Palaiseau, France. angelo.pierangelo@polytechnique.edu.
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRLaboratoire de Physique des Interfaces et des Couches Minces · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRBicêtre Hospital · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRÉcole Polytechnique · FRUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mueller polarimetric imaging enables the detection and quantification of modifications of the collagen fibers in the uterine cervix due to the development of a precancerous lesion. This information is not accessible through the use of the classic colposcope, a low magnification microscope used in current practice for cervical cancer screening. However, the in vivo application of Mueller polarimetric imaging poses an instrumental challenge: the device should be sufficiently compact, while still being able to perform fast and accurate acquisition of Mueller matrices in real-world conditions. In this study, the first wide field Mueller Polarimetric Colposcope (MPC) for the in vivo analysis of uterine cervix is presented. The MPC has been fabricated by grafting a miniaturized Mueller polarimetric imager on a classic colposcope. This new imaging tool performs the fast acquisition of Mueller polarimetric images, thus eliminating any blurring effects due to patient movements. It can be easily used by a practitioner with little change to their existing practice. Finally, the MPC was tested in vivo on a number of patients in the field.

Indexed as

ColposcopesCervix UteriDiagnostic ImagingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28572602
PMCPMC5453972
OpenAlexW2619386287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.