ArticleScientific reports2017
Morphologic and biometric evaluation of chick embryo eyes in ovo using 7 Tesla MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of High-Frequency Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess the In Ovo Development of Chicken Embryos.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Quantitative imaging of corneal endothelial development reveals dynamic but resilient monolayer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Longitudinal volumetric analysis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- How Egg Storage Duration Prior to Incubation Impairs Egg Quality and Chicken Embryonic Development: Contribution of Imaging Technologies.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- In Ovo Sexing of Chicken Eggs by Virus Spectroscopy.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- Ultrahigh-Field Quantitative MR Microscopy of the Chicken Eye In Vivo Throughout the In Ovo Period.Molecular imaging and biology · 2019Article
- The novel model: Experimental optical coherence tomography-guided anterior segment imaging chick embryo model.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purposes of this study were (1) to characterize embryonic eye development during incubation in ovo and (2) to analyze the putative influence of repetitive ultrahigh-field MRI (UHF-MRI) measurements on this development. A population of 38 fertilized chicken eggs was divided into two sub-groups: two eggs (Group A) were examined repeatedly during the developmental period from embryonic day 1 (E1) to embryonic day 20 (E20) to evaluate the influence of daily MRI scanning. A second larger group of 36 eggs was examined pairwise on one day only, from E3 to E20, and the embryos were sacrificed immediately after MR imaging (Group B). Fast T2-weighted MR sequences provided biometric data on the eye with an in-plane resolution of 74 μm. The data show rapid growth of the eye with a steep increase in intraocular dimensions in all axis directions and in eyeball volume during initial development up to E10, followed by a phase of reduced growth rate in later developmental stages. Comparison of the two groups revealed no differences in ocular development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.