Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28572281›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2017

Recurrent Stroke in Minor Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack With Metabolic Syndrome and/or Diabetes Mellitus.

Weiqi Chen, Yuesong Pan, Jing Jing, Xingquan Zhao, Liping Liu, Xia Meng, Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang, CHANCE Investigators

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Diabetes mellitus and efficacy of dual antiplatelet in acute ischemic stroke: A post hoc analysis of the ATAMIS trial.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Weiqi ChenDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuesong PanDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jing JingDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xingquan ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liping LiuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xia MengDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yilong WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China yongjunwang1962@gmail.com yilong528@gmail.com.
Yongjun WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China yongjunwang1962@gmail.com yilong528@gmail.com.
CHANCE Investigators
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to determine the risk conferred by metabolic syndrome (METS) and diabetes mellitus (DM) to recurrent stroke in patients with minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack from the CHANCE (Clopidogrel in High-risk patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events) trial. METHODS AND

resultsIn total, 3044 patients were included. Patients were stratified into 4 groups: neither, METS only, DM only, or both. METS was defined using the Chinese Diabetes Society (CDS) and International Diabetes Foundation (IDF) definitions. The primary outcome was new stroke (including ischemic and hemorrhagic) at 90 days. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to assess the relationship of METS and DM status to the risk of recurrent stroke adjusted for potential covariates. Using the CDS criteria of METS, 53.2%, 17.2%, 19.8%, and 9.8% of patients were diagnosed as neither, METS only, DM only, and both, respectively. After 90 days of follow-up, there were 299 new strokes (293 ischemic, 6 hemorrhagic). Patients with DM only (16.1% versus 6.8%; adjusted hazard ratio 2.50, 95% CI 1.89-3.39) and both (17.1% versus 6.8%; adjusted hazard ratio 2.76, 95% CI 1.98-3.86) had significantly increased rates of recurrent stroke. No interaction effect of antiplatelet therapy by different METS or DM status for the risk of recurrent stroke (

conclusionsConcurrent METS and DM was associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke in patients with minor stroke and transient ischemic attack.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersBlood GlucoseBrain IschemiaChinaChi-Square DistributionDiabetes MellitusDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIschemic Attack, TransientLipidsLogistic ModelsMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedBiomarkersBlood GlucoseLipidsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsdiabetes mellitusmetabolic syndromeprognosisstroke

Identifiers

PMID28572281
PMCPMC5669168
OpenAlexW2621099619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.