Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28572280›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2017

Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption, Vascular Impairment, and Ischemia/Reperfusion Damage in Diabetic Stroke.

Poornima Venkat, Michael Chopp, Jieli Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cytoprotection Concepts for Ischemic Stroke in the Recanalization Era.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Poornima VenkatDepartment of Neurology Research, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Michael ChoppDepartment of Neurology Research, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Jieli ChenDepartment of Neurology Research, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI jieli@neuro.hfh.edu.

Funding

Investigation of D-4F effects of neurovascular remodeling after diabetic strokeR01NS097747 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI CUI, XU, JIANG, QUAN · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
Neurorestorative therapy of stroke with HUCBC in type two diabetic miceR01NS083078 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI CHEN, JIELI · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
MiR-126/ABCA1 mediates exosome induced neurorestorative effects after stroke in T2DM miceR01NS099030 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI CHEN, JIELI · 2016 to 2018
$984k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083078NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097747NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaBlood-Brain BarrierCerebrovascular CirculationDiabetes ComplicationsHumansVascular Resistancebrain vascular injurydiabetes mellitushyperglycemiaischemia reperfusion injurystroke

Identifiers

PMID28572280
PMCPMC5669184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.