Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28572084›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology2017

Ductular and proliferative response of esophageal submucosal glands in a porcine model of esophageal injury and repair.

Leandi Krüger, Liara M Gonzalez, Tiffany A Pridgen, Shannon J McCall, Richard J von Furstenberg, Ivan Harnden, Gwendolyn E Carnighan, Abigail M Cox, Anthony T Blikslager, Katherine S Garman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Pathogenesis of Barrett's Esophagus: Evolving and Emerging Mechanisms.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Epithelial architecture and signaling activity in the adult human esophagus.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Esophageal organoids: applications and future prospects.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Histological and histochemical characteristics of the esophagus in local breed donkey (Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanisms and pathophysiology of Barrett oesophagus.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. A novelVeterinary world · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leandi KrügerCenter for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Liara M GonzalezCenter for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Tiffany A PridgenCenter for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Shannon J McCallDepartment of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Richard J von FurstenbergDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and.
Ivan HarndenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and.
Gwendolyn E CarnighanCenter for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Abigail M CoxCenter for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Anthony T BlikslagerCenter for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Katherine S GarmanDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and katherine.garman@duke.edu.
North Carolina State University · USDuke University · US

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ANTHONY BLIKSLAGER · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
Intestinal stem cell responses to ischemic injury in a large animal modelK01OD019911 · OD · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI GONZALEZ, LIARA M · 2015 to 2019
$608k
Submucosal esophageal structures as a progenitor niche for esophageal repairK08DK098528 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GARMAN, KATHERINE · 2013 to 2017
$594k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK098528NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIH HHS K01 OD019911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal injury is a risk factor for diseases such as Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma. To improve understanding of signaling pathways associated with both normal and abnormal repair, animal models are needed. Traditional rodent models of esophageal repair are limited by the absence of esophageal submucosal glands (ESMGs), which are present in the human esophagus. Previously, we identified acinar ductal metaplasia in human ESMGs in association with both esophageal injury and cancer. In addition, the SOX9 transcription factor has been associated with generation of columnar epithelium and the pathogenesis of BE and is present in ESMGs. To test our hypothesis that ESMGs activate after esophageal injury with an increase in proliferation, generation of a ductal phenotype, and expression of SOX9, we developed a porcine model of esophageal injury and repair using radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The porcine esophagus contains ESMGs, and RFA produces a consistent and reproducible mucosal injury in the esophagus. Here we present a temporal assessment of this model of esophageal repair. Porcine esophagus was evaluated at 0, 6, 18, 24, 48, and 72 h and 5 and 7 days following RFA and compared with control uninjured esophagus. Following RFA, ESMGs demonstrated an increase in ductal phenotype, echoing our prior studies in humans. Proliferation increased in both squamous epithelium and ESMGs postinjury with a prominent population of SOX9-positive cells in ESMGs postinjury. This model promises to be useful in future experiments evaluating mechanisms of esophageal repair.

Indexed as

Active Transport, Cell NucleusAnimalsCell ProliferationEsophageal DiseasesEsophagusFemaleGene Expression RegulationHumansMaleSOX9 Transcription FactorStaining and LabelingSwineSOX9 Transcription Factoresophageal submucosal glandesophagusinjuryproliferationrepair

Identifiers

PMID28572084
PMCPMC5625137
OpenAlexW2621363339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.