Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28572007›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2018

Reading the mind in the touch: Neurophysiological specificity in the communication of emotions by touch.

Louise P Kirsch, Charlotte Krahé, Nadia Blom, Laura Crucianelli, Valentina Moro, Paul M Jenkinson, Aikaterini Fotopoulou

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Opioid-blunted cortisol response to stress is associated with increased negative mood and wanting of social reward.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Paving the way for social touch at a distance: Sonifying tactile interactions and their underlying emotions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The Role of the Skin in Interoception: A Neglected Organ?Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Louise P KirschDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK. Electronic address: l.kirsch@ucl.ac.uk.
Charlotte KrahéDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Nadia BlomDepartment of Psychology, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK.
Laura CrucianelliDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK.
Valentina MoroNPSY.Lab-VR, Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Italy.
Paul M JenkinsonDepartment of Psychology, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK.
Aikaterini FotopoulouDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK.
University College London · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Touch is central to interpersonal interactions. Touch conveys specific emotions about the touch provider, but it is not clear whether this is a purely socially learned function or whether it has neurophysiological specificity. In two experiments with healthy participants (N = 76 and 61) and one neuropsychological single case study, we investigated whether a type of touch characterised by peripheral and central neurophysiological specificity, namely the C tactile (CT) system, can communicate specific emotions and mental states. We examined the specificity of emotions elicited by touch delivered at CT-optimal (3cm/s) and CT-suboptimal (18cm/s) velocities (Experiment 1) at different body sites which contain (forearm) vs. do not contain (palm of the hand) CT fibres (Experiment 2). Blindfolded participants were touched without any contextual cues, and were asked to identify the touch provider's emotion and intention. Overall, CT-optimal touch (slow, gentle touch on the forearm) was significantly more likely than other types of touch to convey arousal, lust or desire. Affiliative emotions such as love and related intentions such as social support were instead reliably elicited by gentle touch, irrespective of CT-optimality, suggesting that other top-down factors contribute to these aspects of tactile social communication. To explore the neural basis of this communication, we also tested this paradigm in a stroke patient with right perisylvian damage, including the posterior insular cortex, which is considered as the primary cortical target of CT afferents, but excluding temporal cortex involvement that has been linked to more affiliative aspects of CT-optimal touch. His performance suggested an impairment in 'reading' emotions based on CT-optimal touch. Taken together, our results suggest that the CT system can add specificity to emotional and social communication, particularly with regards to feelings of desire and arousal. On the basis of these findings, we speculate that its primary functional role may be to enhance the 'sensual salience' of tactile interactions.

Indexed as

CommunicationInterpersonal RelationsReadingAdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceChi-Square DistributionEmotionsFemaleHandHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntentionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleAffective touchEmotionInsulaInteroceptionInterpersonal interactionsTactile communication

Identifiers

PMID28572007
PMCPMC6078710
OpenAlexW2618980085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.