ArticleHormones and behavior2017
Sex differences in the drinking response to angiotensin II (AngII): Effect of body weight.
Article in Hormones and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- A microstructural analysis of sodium and water intake in male and female rats.Physiology & behavior · 2026Article
- Drinking microstructure analysis of direct controls of water intake in male and female rats.Physiology & behavior · 2026Article
- Fluid transitions.Neuropharmacology · 2024Review
- The role of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in fluid and food intakes in vasopressin-deficient Brattleboro rats.Physiology & behavior · 2023Article
- Sex Differences in Salt Appetite: Perspectives from Animal Models and Human Studies.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Chronic intracerebroventricular infusion of angiotensin II causes dose- and sex-dependent effects on intake behaviors and energy homeostasis in C57BL/6J mice.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2022Article
- Fluid intake, what's dopamine got to do with it?Physiology & behavior · 2021Article
- The anti-dipsogenic and anti-natriorexigenic effects of estradiol, but not the anti-pressor effect, are lost in aged female rats.Physiological reports · 2021Article
- Female Sex, a Major Risk Factor for Salt-Sensitive Hypertension.Current hypertension reports · 2020Review
- Novel high molecular weight albumin-conjugated angiotensin II activates β-arrestin and G-protein pathways.Endocrine · 2019Article
- Gonadal hormones in female rats protect against dehydration-induced memory impairments in the novel object recognition paradigm.Hormones and behavior · 2019Article
- Aging affects isoproterenol-induced water drinking, astrocyte density, and central neuronal activation in female Brown Norway rats.Physiology & behavior · 2018Article
- Sex Differences in the Behavioral Desensitization of Water Intake Observed After Repeated Central Injections of Angiotensin II.Endocrinology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sex differences in fluid intake stimulated by angiotensin II (AngII) have been reported, but the direction of the differences is inconsistent. To resolve these discrepancies, we measured water intake by male and female rats given AngII. Males drank more than females, but when intake was normalized to body weight, the sex difference was reversed. Weight-matched males and females, however, had no difference in intake. Using a linear mixed model analysis, we found that intake was influenced by weight, sex, and AngII dose. We used linear regression to disentangle these effects further. Comparison of regression coefficients revealed sex and weight differences at high doses of AngII. Specifically, after 100ng AngII, weight was a predictor of intake in males, but not in females. Next, we tested for differences in AngII-induced intake in male and females allowed to drink both water and saline. Again, males drank more water than females, but females showed a stronger preference for saline. Drinking microstructure analysis suggested that these differences were mediated by postingestive signals and more bottle switches by the females. Finally, we probed for differences in the expression of components of the renin-angiotensin system in the brains of males and females and found sex differences in several genes in discrete brain regions. These results provide new information to help understand key sex differences in ingestive behaviors, and highlight the need for additional research to understand baseline sex differences, particularly in light of the new NIH initiative to balance sex in biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.