ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
Free tissue flaps in head and neck reconstruction: clinical application and analysis of 93 patients of a single institution.
Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vascularized free flaps based oral reconstruction: a narrative review of dental functional outcomes.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Review
- Case Report: Free fibula flap for post-oncologic mandibular reconstruction, first experience in Tirana.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Anatomical Study of the Application of a Galeo-Pericranial Flap in Oral Cavity Defects Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Microvasular Free Flap Reconstruction in Head and Neck Surgery: Complication and Outcome of 80 Flaps.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022Article
- Advanced Head and Neck Reconstruction; A Seven-Year Experience in Iran.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022Article
- Recipient vessel selection for head and neck reconstruction: A 30-year experience in a single institution.Archives of craniofacial surgery · 2020Article
- Reconstruction with Free Flaps of Head and Neck Cancer Defects: A National Cohort Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020Article
- Hair disorders in cancer survivors.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2019Review
- Anatomical analysis of antebrachial cutaneous nerve distribution pattern and its clinical implications for sensory reconstruction.PloS one · 2019Article
- Evaluation of treatment outcome amongst two different treatment modalities for reconstruction of carcinoma of tongue patients: The infrahyoid myocutaneous flap versus radial forearm flap.National journal of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionReconstruction with a free flap is routine in head and neck surgery because of better functional outcomes, improved esthetics, and generally higher success rates.
objectiveTo evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing different microvascular free flap reconstructions.
methodsThis was a retrospective study of 93 patients undergoing reconstructions with free flaps from 2007 to 2015. Four types of free flap were performed: anterolateral thigh (76.3%), radial forearm (16.1%), fibula (4.3%) and jejunum (3.3%). Patients' demographic data were collected, and the outcomes measured included flap survival and complications. Postoperative functional and oncological outcome were also analyzed.
resultsThe patients included 73 men and 20 women, with a mean age of 56.1 years. The most common tumor location was the tongue. Squamous cell carcinoma represented the vast majority of the diagnosed tumors (89.2%). The most common recipient vessels were the superior thyroid artery (77.4%) and the internal jugular vein (91.4%). Nine patients required emergency surgical re-exploration and the overall flap success rate was 90.3%. Venous thrombosis was the most common cause for re-exploration. Other complications included wound infection (5.4%), wound dehiscence (1.1%), partial flap necrosis (9.7%), fistula formation (10.8%), and 1 bleeding (1.1%). The majority of patients had satisfactory cosmetic and functional results of both donor site and recipient site after 46.7 months of mean follow-up.
conclusionMicrosurgical free flap is shown to be a valuable and reliable method in head and neck surgery. It can be used safely and effectively with minimal morbidity in selected patients. The reconstruction can be performed by appropriately skilled surgeons with acceptable outcomes. Success rate appears to increase as clinical experience is gained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.