Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28571671›Full record

Trial reportEBioMedicine2017

The Microbiome of Infants Recruited to a Randomised Placebo-controlled Probiotic Trial (PiPS Trial).

Michael Millar, Jo Seale, Melanie Greenland, Pollyanna Hardy, Edmund Juszczak, Mark Wilks, Nicola Panton, Kate Costeloe, William G Wade

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in EBioMedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Effects ofCell reports. Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Determinants of microbial colonization in the premature gut.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Methods for exploring the faecal microbiome of premature infants: a review.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Incidence of necrotising enterocolitis before and after introducing routine prophylacticArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2020
    Observational
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael MillarDepartment of Infection, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: michael.millar@bartshealth.nhs.uk.
Jo SealeDepartment of Infection, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Melanie GreenlandNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Pollyanna HardyNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Edmund JuszczakNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mark WilksDepartment of Infection, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Nicola PantonDepartment of Infection, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Kate CosteloeCentre for Paediatrics, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
William G WadeBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Barts Health NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbial dysbiosis associated with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants suggests that early exposure to probiotics may decrease and antibiotics may increase NEC risk. However, administration of Bifidobacterium breve strain BBG-001 to preterm infants did not affect NEC incidence in a multicenter randomised controlled phase 3 trial (PiPS trial). Using a subset of these subjects we compared the fecal microbiome of probiotic and placebo groups and assessed the impact of early antibiotic treatment. Extracted DNA from 103 fecal samples collected at 36weeks post-menstrual age underwent PCR amplification of a fragment of the 16S rRNA gene. Heatmaps were constructed showing the proportions of sequences from bacterial families present at >1% of the community. Stepwise logistic regression assessed the association between early antibiotic exposure and microbiome group. There was no difference in the microbial richness and diversity of the microbiome of preterm infants following treatment with probiotic or a placebo. Conversely, early antimicrobial exposure was associated with different patterns of colonisation, specifically a relative abundance of Proteobacteria. These findings highlight that the potential influence of probiotics on the microbiome of preterm infants remains unclear whereas the modulatory effect of antibiotic exposure on microbial colonisation requires further research.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBifidobacteriumDysbiosisEnterocolitis, NecrotizingGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMetagenomeMetagenomicsOdds RatioOutcome Assessment, Health CareProbioticsRNA, Ribosomal, 16STime-to-TreatmentRNA, Ribosomal, 16SMicrobiomeNecrotizing enterocolitisPremature infantProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID28571671
PMCPMC5478240
OpenAlexW2616217075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.