ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2017
β-Blockers and Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Without Heart Failure or Ventricular Dysfunction.
Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
β Blocker Use and Mortality in Hospital Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Heart Failure
BEta Blocker dEprescription Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft sURGERy: Feasibility and Safety Pilot (BEEFBURGER Trial)
Who cites it
82 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 220 citations in OpenAlex.
- β-blocker and clinical outcomes in patients after myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Beta-blockers for secondary prevention following myocardial infarction in patients without reduced ejection fraction or heart failure: an updated meta-analysis.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- The effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Future cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Latin-American guidelines of recommendations at discharge from an acute coronary syndrome.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Guideline
- Adherence with cardiovascular medications and the outcomes in patients with coronary arterial disease: "Real-world" evidence.Clinical cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- Long-Term Effect of β-Blocker Use on Clinical Outcomes in Postmyocardial Infarction Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of oral β-blocker treatment on mortality in contemporary post-myocardial infarction patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2019Pooled it
- The prognostic value of global longitudinal strain in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved ejection fraction: a prespecified substudy of the REDUCE-AMI trial.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2025Trial
- Beta-blockers and Short-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes In Patients Hospitalized For Acute Coronary Syndrome and a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ≥40.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Prognostic impact of long-term beta-blockers post-stemi: a meta-analytic review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- EBM BLS: Beta-blockers Fail to Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Preserved Ejection fraction.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction: an umbrella review.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Beta-blocker Therapy after Myocardial Infarction without Reduced Ejection Fraction: An EF-stratified Reappraisal in the Contemporary Era.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on the effect of beta-blocker therapy on 1-year mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025Observational
- Review
- Exploring the Impact of Beta-Blockers Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Targeted M-Channel Activation in the Left Stellate Ganglion Protects Against Ischemia-Induced Ventricular Arrhythmias in Canines.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without heart failure (HF), it is unclear if β-blockers are associated with reduced mortality.
objectivesThe goal of this study was to determine the association between β-blocker use and mortality in patients with AMI without HF or left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).
methodsThis cohort study used national English and Welsh registry data from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project. A total of 179,810 survivors of hospitalization with AMI without HF or LVSD, between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2013 (final follow-up: December 31, 2013), were assessed. Survival-time inverse probability weighting propensity scores and instrumental variable analyses were used to investigate the association between the use of β-blockers and 1-year mortality.
resultsOf 91,895 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and 87,915 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 88,542 (96.4%) and 81,933 (93.2%) received β-blockers, respectively. For the entire cohort, with >163,772 person-years of observation, there were 9,373 deaths (5.2%). Unadjusted 1-year mortality was lower for patients who received β-blockers compared with those who did not (4.9% vs. 11.2%; p < 0.001). However, after weighting and adjustment, there was no significant difference in mortality between those with and without β-blocker use (average treatment effect [ATE] coefficient: 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.60 to 0.75; p = 0.827). Findings were similar for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (ATE coefficient: 0.30; 95% CI: -0.98 to 1.58; p = 0.637) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (ATE coefficient: -0.07; 95% CI: -0.68 to 0.54; p = 0.819).
conclusionsAmong survivors of hospitalization with AMI who did not have HF or LVSD as recorded in the hospital, the use of β-blockers was not associated with a lower risk of death at any time point up to 1 year. (β-Blocker Use and Mortality in Hospital Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Heart Failure; NCT02786654).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.