Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28571573›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Comparison of molecular serotyping approaches of Streptococcus agalactiae from genomic sequences.

Georgia Kapatai, Darshana Patel, Androulla Efstratiou, Victoria J Chalker

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evidence of a novel sublineage ofMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bacteriocin ProducingMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Phylogeny, recombination, and invasiveness of group B Streptococcus revealed by genomic comparisons of its global strains.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Molecular Identification of Invasive Non-typeable Group BFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antibiotic Resistance and Molecular Epidemiological Characteristics ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2020
    Article
  17. Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women in Brazil: prevalence, serotypes, and antibiotic resistance.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2019
    Review
  18. Uncertainties in Screening and Prevention of Group B Streptococcus Disease.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Georgia KapataiRespiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacterial Reference Unit, Public Health England, London, UK. georgia.kapatai@phe.gov.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3145-2136
Darshana PatelMicrobiology Reference Division, Public Health England, London, UK.
Androulla EfstratiouMicrobiology Reference Division, Public Health England, London, UK.
Victoria J ChalkerRespiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacterial Reference Unit, Public Health England, London, UK.
Public Health England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGroup B streptococcus (GBS) capsular polysaccharide is one of the major virulence factors underlying invasive GBS disease and a component of forthcoming vaccines. Serotype classification of GBS is based on the capsule polysaccharide of which ten variants are known to exist (Ia, Ib, II-IX). Current methods for GBS serotype assignment rely on latex agglutination or PCR while more recently a whole genome sequencing method was reported. In this study, three distinct algorithms for serotype assignment from genomic data were assessed using a panel of 790 clinical isolates.

methodsThe first approach utilised the entire capsular locus coupled with a mapping methodology. The second approach continues from the first and utilised a SNP-based methodology across the conserved cpsD-G region to differentiate serotypes Ia-VII and IX. Finally the third approach used the variable cpsG -K region coupled with a mapping methodology. All three approaches were assessed for typeability (percentage of isolates assigned a serotype) and concordance to the latex agglutination methodology.

resultsFollowing comparisons, the third approach using the variable cpsG-K region demonstrated the best performance with 99.9% typeability and 86.7% concordance. Overall, of the 105 discordant isolates, 71 were resolved following retesting of latex agglutination and whole genome sequencing, 20 failed to assign a serotype using latex agglutination and only 14 were found to be truly discordant on re-testing. Comparison of this final approach with the previously described assembly-based approach returned identical results.

conclusionsThese results demonstrated that molecular capsular typing using whole genome sequencing and a mapping-based approach is a viable alternative to the traditional, latex agglutination-based serotyping method and can be implemented in a public health microbiology setting.

Indexed as

GenomicsBase SequenceChromosome MappingGenome, BacterialPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSerotypingStreptococcus agalactiaeGroup B StreptococciSerotypingStreptococcus agalactiaeWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28571573
PMCPMC5455115
OpenAlexW2617082052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.