Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28571213›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2017

The Effect of Metoclopramide Addition to Lidocaine on Pain of Patients with Grades II and III Post-Episiotomy Repair.

Sheida Shabanian, Sara Kalbasi, Gholamreza Shabanian, Bahram Khoram, Forozan Ganji

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating the preventive effect of metoclopramide and aminophylline on pain after deep vitrectomy.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sheida ShabanianAssistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Sara KalbasiGynaecologist, Ardestan Hospital, Ardestan University of Medical Sciences, Ardestan, Iran.
Gholamreza ShabanianAssistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Bahram KhoramAnesthesiologist, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Forozan GanjiAssociate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEpisiotomy is the most common procedure used for dilatation of the vaginal opening for giving birth. Although episiotomy is associated with benefits for the mother, it may lead to short term and long term disabilities, including postpartum perineal pain that is secondary to perineal tearing.

aimThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of subcutaneous lidocaine compared with lidocaine and metoclopramide on pain after episiotomy. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this clinical trial study, the patients (83 for control group and 83 for case group) with episiotomy Grades II and III were enrolled and were asked to express their postpartum episiotomy pain as a number, from zero (no pain) to 10 (severest pain) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS score) at 0, 30 minute, 1 hour, 2 hour, 4 hour, 6 hour and 12 hour postpartum. Patients at the second stage of labour (crowning) were assigned to two groups: In the control group, 5 cc lidocaine 2% and in the case group, 5 cc lidocaine + 10 mg metoclopramide was injected for episiotomy. Then, the pain score was compared between the two groups. The data were analyzed by t-test and chi-square test with software SPSS version 20.0.

resultsMean age of the women was 23.19±0.46 years in the control group and 23.96±0.58 years in the case group with no significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05). The mean pain score in the control group was 3.54±0.71 and in the case group 2.93±0.91 at 30 minutes after the injection, with a statistically significant difference. At other intervals, postnatal pain scores in the case group was lower than those of the control group (p<0.05).

conclusionInjection of metoclopramide with lidocaine is more effective than lidocaine alone for relieving the pain after episiotomy.

Indexed as

Perineal painPlazilVisual analogue scale

Identifiers

PMID28571213
PMCPMC5449859
OpenAlexW2618915866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.