Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28570948›Full record

ReviewRedox biology2017

Direct

Alfonso Blázquez-Castro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Redox biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Pyrrolo[1,2-The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nanotherapies Based on ROS Regulation in Oral Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. 4-Aminothiophenol Photodimerization Without Plasmons.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Article
  15. Recent advances in nanoparticle-based targeting tactics for antibacterial photodynamic therapy.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2022
    Review
  16. Supramolecular Control of Singlet Oxygen Generation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alfonso Blázquez-CastroDepartment of Physics of Materials, Faculty of Sciences, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Formerly at Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies (AIAS)/Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: singlet763@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular oxygen (O

Indexed as

PhotonsAnimalsHumansOxidation-ReductionPhotochemotherapyReactive Oxygen SpeciesSinglet OxygenReactive Oxygen SpeciesSinglet OxygenBiophotonicsLow-level laser therapy (LLLT)Photodynamic therapy (PDT)Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)Redox biologySinglet oxygen

Identifiers

PMID28570948
PMCPMC5451181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.