Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28570723›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2017

Oral Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study.

Timothy L Jackson, David Boyer, David M Brown, Nauman Chaudhry, Michael Elman, Chris Liang, Denis O'Shaughnessy, Edward C Parsons, Sunil Patel, Jason S Slakter and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01674569 (A Phase 1 Open-label, Dose Escalation Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Biologic Activity/Efficacy of the VEGFR/PDGFR Inhibitor X-82 Administered Per Os in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01674569 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 1 Open-label, Dose Escalation Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Biologic Activity/Efficacy of the VEGFR/PDGFR Inhibitor X-82 Administered Per Os in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTyrogenexRan2012 to 2015Enrolled35ConditionsExudative Macular DegenerationArmsX-82 oral, ranibizumab (Lucentis)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Pipeline therapies for neovascular age related macular degeneration.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Timothy L JacksonSchool of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
David BoyerRetina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group, Beverly Hills, California.
David M BrownBlanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Retina Consultants of Houston, Houston, Texas.
Nauman ChaudhryNew England Retina Associates, Guilford, Connecticut.
Michael ElmanElman Retina Group, Baltimore, Maryland.
Chris LiangTyrogenex Inc, Rockville, Maryland.
Denis O'ShaughnessyTyrogenex Inc, Rockville, Maryland.
Edward C ParsonsTyrogenex Inc, Rockville, Maryland.
Sunil PatelRetina Research Institute of Texas, Abilene.
Jason S SlakterDigital Angiography Reading Center, New York, New York.
Philip J RosenfeldBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Reprogenetics · USElman Retina Group · USKing's College School · GBNew England Retina Associates · USRetina Consultants of Houston · USRetina Research Institute of Texas · USRetina Vitreous Associates Medical Group · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: An oral treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration would be less burdensome than repeated intravitreous injections. X-82 is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor active against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor. Objective: To undertake safety testing of oral X-82 administered for the treatment of neovascular AMD. Design, Setting, and Participants: Phase 1, open-label, uncontrolled, dose-escalation study at 5 US retinal clinics between November 2012 and March 2015 (Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group, Beverly Hills, California; Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Retina Consultants of Houston, Houston, Texas; New England Retina Associates, Guilford, Connecticut; Elman Retina Group, Baltimore, Maryland; and Retina Research Institute of Texas, Abilene). Thirty-five participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, 7 of whom were treatment naive. Interventions: Participants received oral X-82 for 24 weeks at 50 mg alternate days (n = 3), 50 mg daily (n = 8), 100 mg alternate days (n = 4), 100 mg daily (n = 10), 200 mg daily (n = 7), and 300 mg daily (n = 3), with intravitreous anti-VEGF therapy using predefined retreatment criteria. Every 4 weeks, participants underwent best-corrected visual acuity measurement, fundus examination, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was adverse events. Other outcomes included visual acuity, central subfield retinal thickness, and number of anti-VEGF injections. Results: Of the 35 participants, the mean age was 76.8 years, 16 were men and 19 were women, and 33 were white and 2 were nonwhite. Of 25 participants (71%) who completed the 24 weeks of X-82 treatment, all except 1 maintained or improved their visual acuity (mean [SD], +3.8 [9.6] letters). Fifteen participants (60%) required no anti-VEGF injections (mean, 0.68). Mean [SD] central subfield thickness reduced by -50 [97] μm, with 8 participants (all receiving at least 100 mg daily) demonstrating sustained reductions despite no anti-VEGF injections. The most common adverse events attributed to X-82 were diarrhea (n = 6), nausea (n = 5), fatigue (n = 5), and transaminase elevation (n = 4). A dose relationship to the transaminase elevations was not identified; all normalized when X-82 was discontinued. All but 1 were asymptomatic. Ten participants withdrew consent or discontinued prematurely, 6 owing to adverse events attributed to X-82 including leg cramps (n = 2), elevated alanine aminotransferase (n = 2), diarrhea (n = 1), and nausea/anorexia (n = 1). Conclusions and Relevance: X-82 can be associated with reversible, elevated liver enzymes; hence, liver function testing is needed to identify those unsuited to treatment. Although 17% of participants discontinued X-82 owing to AEs, those who completed the study had lower than expected anti-VEGF injection rates. Further studies appear justified, with a phase 2 randomized clinical study under way.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAdministration, OralAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedProtein-Tyrosine KinasesRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsEnzyme InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID28570723
PMCPMC5710207
OpenAlexW2621250360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.