ArticlePloS one2017
Probing planetary biodiversity with DNA barcodes: The Noctuoidea of North America.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- High resolution DNA barcode library for European butterflies reveals continental patterns of mitochondrial genetic diversity.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Article
- DNA barcode library for European Gelechiidae (Lepidoptera) suggests greatly underestimated species diversity.ZooKeys · 2020Article
- DNA barcodes for Aotearoa New Zealand Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera).Biodiversity data journal · 2020Article
- A reference library for Canadian invertebrates with 1.5 million barcodes, voucher specimens, and DNA samples.Scientific data · 2019Article
- The conundrum of species delimitation: a genomic perspective on a mitogenetically super-variable butterfly.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Linking morphological and molecular taxonomy for the identification of poultry house, soil, and nest dwelling mites in the Western Palearctic.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Lepidoptera of Canada.ZooKeys · 2019Review
- The diversity of terrestrial arthropods in Canada.ZooKeys · 2019Review
- A new species ofZooKeys · 2018Article
- A new species ofZooKeys · 2018Article
- Three species in one: a revision ofZooKeys · 2018Article
- Insect diversity in the Saharo-Arabian region: Revealing a little-studied fauna by DNA barcoding.PloS one · 2018Article
- A new species ofZooKeys · 2018Article
- Large geographic distance versus small DNA barcode divergence: Insights from a comparison of European to South Siberian Lepidoptera.PloS one · 2018Article
- A revision ofZooKeys · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study reports the assembly of a DNA barcode reference library for species in the lepidopteran superfamily Noctuoidea from Canada and the USA. Based on the analysis of 69,378 specimens, the library provides coverage for 97.3% of the noctuoid fauna (3565 of 3664 species). In addition to verifying the strong performance of DNA barcodes in the discrimination of these species, the results indicate close congruence between the number of species analyzed (3565) and the number of sequence clusters (3816) recognized by the Barcode Index Number (BIN) system. Distributional patterns across 12 North American ecoregions are examined for the 3251 species that have GPS data while BIN analysis is used to quantify overlap between the noctuoid faunas of North America and other zoogeographic regions. This analysis reveals that 90% of North American noctuoids are endemic and that just 7.5% and 1.8% of BINs are shared with the Neotropics and with the Palearctic, respectively. One third (29) of the latter species are recent introductions and, as expected, they possess low intraspecific divergences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.