Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28569374›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2017

Quantitative pulsed CEST-MRI at a clinical 3T MRI system.

Julia Stabinska, Tom Cronenberg, Hans-Jörg Wittsack, Rotem Shlomo Lanzman, Anja Müller-Lutz

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julia StabinskaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. Julia.Stabinska@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2730-4250
Tom CronenbergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hans-Jörg WittsackDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Rotem Shlomo LanzmanDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Anja Müller-LutzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

Forschungskommission of the Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf 13/2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe goal of this study was to quantify CEST related parameters such as chemical exchange rate and fractional concentration of exchanging protons at a clinical 3T scanner. For this purpose, two CEST quantification approaches-the AREX metric (for 'apparent exchange dependent relaxation'), and the AREX-based Ω-plot method were used. In addition, two different pulsed RF irradiation schemes, using Gaussian-shaped and spin-lock pulses, were compared. MATERIALS AND

methodsNumerical simulations as well as MRI measurements in phantoms were performed. For simulations, the Bloch-McConnell equations were solved using a two-pool exchange model. MR experiments were performed on a clinical 3T MRI scanner using a cylindrical phantom filled with creatine solution at different pH values and different concentrations.

resultsThe validity of the Ω-plot method and the AREX approach using spin-lock preparation for determination of the quantitative CEST parameters was demonstrated. Especially promising results were achieved for the Ω-plot method when the spin-lock preparation was employed.

conclusionPulsed CEST at 3T could be used to quantify parameters such as exchange rate constants and concentrations of protons exchanging with free water. In the future this technique might be used to estimate the exchange rates and concentrations of biochemical substances in human tissues in vivo.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMagnetic FieldsMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, ImagingProtonsRadio WavesWaterProtonsWaterChemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)CreatineMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Identifiers

PMID28569374
OpenAlexW2617342169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.