Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28569349›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2017

Real-time PCR quantification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: does the use of nuclear or mitochondrial markers make a difference?

Alena Voříšková, Jan Jansa, David Püschel, Manuela Krüger, Tomáš Cajthaml, Miroslav Vosátka, Martina Janoušková

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alena VoříškováInstitute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, Průhonice, 252 43, Czech Republic. alena.voriskova@ibot.cas.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2108-7892
Jan JansaInstitute of Microbiology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Prague, 142 20, Czech Republic.
David PüschelInstitute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, Průhonice, 252 43, Czech Republic.
Manuela KrügerInstitute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, Průhonice, 252 43, Czech Republic.
Tomáš CajthamlInstitute of Microbiology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Prague, 142 20, Czech Republic.
Miroslav VosátkaInstitute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, Průhonice, 252 43, Czech Republic.
Martina JanouškováInstitute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, Průhonice, 252 43, Czech Republic.
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can be quantified by different approaches. We compared two approaches that enable discrimination of specific AMF taxa and are therefore emerging as alternative to most commonly performed microscopic quantification of AMF in roots: quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using markers in nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) and mitochondrial ribosomal DNA (mtDNA). In a greenhouse experiment, Medicago truncatula was inoculated with four isolates belonging to different AMF species (Rhizophagus irregularis, Claroideoglomus claroideum, Gigaspora margarita and Funneliformis mosseae). The AMF were quantified in the root samples by qPCR targeted to both markers, microscopy and contents of AMF-specific phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA). Copy numbers of nrDNA and mtDNA were closely related within all isolates; however, the slopes and intercepts of the linear relationships significantly differed among the isolates. Across all isolates, a large proportion of variance in nrDNA copy numbers was explained by root colonization intensity or contents of AMF-specific PLFA, while variance in mtDNA copy numbers was mainly explained by differences among AMF isolates. We propose that the encountered inter-isolate differences in the ratios of mtDNA and nrDNA copy numbers reflect different physiological states of the isolates. Our results suggest that nrDNA is a more suitable marker region than mtDNA for the quantification of multiple AMF taxa as its copy numbers are better related to fungal biomass across taxa than are copy numbers of mtDNA.

Indexed as

Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionCell NucleusDNA, FungalDNA, MitochondrialGlomeromycotaMedicago truncatulaMycorrhizaePlant RootsDNA, FungalDNA, MitochondrialArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiIsolate discriminationMicrosymbiont screeningMitochondrial DNAMolecular genetic quantificationNuclear ribosomal DNAPLFAReal-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID28569349
OpenAlexW2620098263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.