Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28569257›Full record

ReviewJournal of biosciences2017

Current status and future prospect of FSHD region gene 1.

Arman Kunwar Hansda, Ankit Tiwari, Manjusha Dixit

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biosciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arman Kunwar HansdaSchool of Biological Sciences, National Institute of Science Education and Research, Khurda 752 050 Odisha, India.
Ankit Tiwari
Manjusha Dixit
National Institute of Science Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FSHD region gene 1 (FRG1), as the name suggests, is the primary candidate gene for fascioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy disease. It seemingly affects muscle physiology in normal individuals but in FSHD, where it is found to be highly upregulated, might be involved in disruption of face, scapula and humeral skeletal muscle. Literature on FRG1, reviewed from 1996 to 2016, reveals that it is primarily associated with muscle development and maintenance. Approximately 75% of FSHD patients also show vascular abnormalities indicating that FRG1 might have some part to play in these abnormalities. Research involving vasculature in X. laevis larvae shows that FRG1 positively affects normal vasculature. Few of the well-established angiogenic regulators seem to get affected by abnormal expression level of FRG1. Its primary localization in sub nuclear structures like Cajal bodies and nuclear speckles indicates regulation of the above-mentioned factors by transcriptional and post-transcriptional machineries, but in-depth studies need to be done to conclude a clear statement. In this review, we have attempted to present all the work done on FRG1, all the lacunas which need to be unraveled, and hypothesized a model for our readers to get an insight into its molecular mechanism.

Indexed as

AnimalsGene Expression RegulationHumansLarvaMicrofilament ProteinsMuscular Dystrophy, FacioscapulohumeralNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsXenopus laevisFRG1 protein, humanMicrofilament ProteinsNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28569257
OpenAlexW2606299406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.