Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28569159›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2017

Fast and robust single PCR for Plasmodium sporozoite detection in mosquitoes using the cytochrome oxidase I gene.

Diego F Echeverry, Nicholas A Deason, Victoria Makuru, Jenna Davidson, Honglin Xiao, Julie Niedbalski, Xiaoyu Yu, Jennifer C Stevenson, Hugo Bugoro, Allan Aparaimo and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spatial temporal distribution ofGigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pathogen prospecting of museums: Reconstructing malaria epidemiology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Diego F EcheverryEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA. decheve1@nd.edu.
Nicholas A DeasonEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Victoria MakuruEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Jenna DavidsonEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Honglin XiaoEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Julie NiedbalskiEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Xiaoyu YuEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Jennifer C StevensonJohns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hugo BugoroNational Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Allan AparaimoNational Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Hedrick ReubenWestern Province Malaria Control, Gizo, Western Province, Solomon Islands.
Robert CooperAustralian Army Malaria Institute, Gallipoli Barracks, Enoggera, 4052, Australia.
Thomas R BurkotAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia.
Tanya L RussellAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia.
Frank H CollinsEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Neil F LoboEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
University of Notre Dame · USJames Cook University · AUJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of the South Pacific - Solomon Islands Campus · SB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecular tools for detecting malaria-infected mosquitoes with improved practicality, sensitivity and specificity, and high-throughput are required. A common PCR technique used to detect mosquitoes infected with Plasmodium spp. is a nested PCR assay based on the 18s-rRNA gene. However, this technique has several technical limitations, is laborious and time consuming.

methodsIn this study, a PCR-based on the Plasmodium cytochrome oxidase I (COX-I) gene was compared with the 18s-rRNA nested PCR using serial dilutions (330-0.0012 pg) of DNA from Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium knowlesi and with DNA from 48 positive and negative Kenyan mosquitoes (previously detected by using both ELISA and PCR). This assay for Plasmodium spp. DNA detection using the fast COX-I PCR assay was then performed individually on 2122 field collected mosquitoes (from the Solomon Islands) in which DNA was extracted from head and thorax.

resultsThe fast COX-I PCR assay took 1 h to run and consistently detected as low as to 0.043 pg of parasite DNA (equivalent to two parasites) in a single PCR, while analyses with the 18s-rRNA nested PCR required 4 h to complete with a consistent detection threshold of 1.5 pg of DNA. Both assays produced concordant results when applied to the 48 Kenyan control samples with known Plasmodium spp. infection status. The fast COX-I PCR identified 23/2122 Plasmodium-infected mosquitoes from the Solomon Islands.

conclusionsThis new COX-I PCR adapted for a single PCR reaction is a faster, simpler, cheaper, more sensitive technique amenable to high-throughput analyses for Plasmodium DNA detection in mosquitoes and is comparable to the 18s-rRNA nested PCR. The improved sensitivity seen with the fast COX-I PCR will improve the accuracy of mosquito infection rate determination.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesElectron Transport Complex IVFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMelanesiaPlasmodium falciparumPlasmodium knowlesiPlasmodium vivaxPolymerase Chain ReactionProtozoan ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSensitivity and SpecificitySporozoitesElectron Transport Complex IVProtozoan ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal, 18S18s-rRNAAnophelesCytochrome oxidase IDiagnosisDNA barcodingMalariaPlasmodiumSolomon IslandsSporozoiteVectors

Identifiers

PMID28569159
PMCPMC5452387
OpenAlexW2617030473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.