Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28569116›Full record

ArticleChronic respiratory disease2018

Patient and health care professional perspectives on using telehealth to deliver pulmonary rehabilitation.

J A Inskip, H Novak Lauscher, L C Li, G A Dumont, A Garde, K Ho, A M Hoens, J D Road, C J Ryerson, P G Camp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chronic respiratory disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Telerehabilitation Services Remain Increased Post-COVID-19 in Australia.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Digitization in Everyday Nursing Care: A Vignette Study in German Hospitals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J A Inskip1 Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
H Novak Lauscher3 Digital Emergency Medicine, UBC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
L C Li2 Department of Physical Therapy, UBC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
G A Dumont5 Electrical and Computer Engineering, UBC, Vancouver, Canada.
A Garde5 Electrical and Computer Engineering, UBC, Vancouver, Canada.
K Ho3 Digital Emergency Medicine, UBC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
A M Hoens2 Department of Physical Therapy, UBC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J D Road6 Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, UBC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
C J Ryerson1 Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
P G Camp1 Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify the necessary features of pulmonary telerehabilitation (P-TR) from the perspectives of individuals living with chronic lung disease and health care professionals (HCPs) who deliver pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Focus groups were carried out with patients ( n = 26) and HCPs ( n = 26) to elicit and explore their opinions about the critical elements of in-person PR and ideas for how these elements could be supported using technology. A questionnaire was used to assess technology use, PR experience, and general health status. Four key elements of PR were identified as critical to P-TR: the social aspect of PR; communicating with HCPs for education and support; using biosensors for monitoring and promoting self-knowledge; and the evolution of support with progress over time. A range of technology-enabled devices and programs were suggested as means to recreate aspects of these integral elements. Consultations with patients and HCPs suggest that users are interested in technology and want to ensure it recreates the important aspects of PR. Patients and HCPs identified similar key elements for P-TR. The opinions and suggestions of patients and HCPs should be the driving force of innovation if P-TR is to succeed in improving health outcomes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthTelerehabilitationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsthmaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansLung Diseases, InterstitialMaleMiddle AgedNursesPhysical TherapistsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveChronic lung diseasechronic obstructive lung diseasefocus groupspulmonary rehabilitationqualitative methodstechnologytelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID28569116
PMCPMC5802656
OpenAlexW2620640873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.