Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28569042›Full record

Trial reportCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2017

Exposure-Response Analysis of Necitumumab Efficacy in Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

E Chigutsa, A J Long, J E Wallin

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2022
    Article
  6. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. A Review of Monoclonal Antibody-Based Treatments in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  9. Enhanced Detection of Treatment Effects on Metastatic Colorectal Cancer with Volumetric CT Measurements for Tumor Burden Growth Rate Evaluation.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E ChigutsaPKPD&Pharmacometrics, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
A J LongPKPD&Pharmacometrics, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
J E WallinEli Lilly Sweden, Solna, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to describe the exposure-response relationship of necitumumab efficacy in squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients and evaluate intrinsic and extrinsic patient descriptors that may guide dosing. SQUIRE was a phase III study comparing necitumumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in 1,014 patients. An integrated model for tumor size dynamics and overall survival was developed, where reduction in tumor size results in a decrease in survival hazard. The change in tumor size was characterized using linear growth and first-order shrinkage. Overall survival was described using a combination of a Weibull function and Gompertz function for the hazard, with dynamic tumor size being a predictor for the hazard. Although body weight resulted in higher clearance and lower exposure, simulations showed that an 800 mg flat dose provided optimal response regardless of body weight.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCisplatinDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleModels, TheoreticalSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabinenecitumumab

Identifiers

PMID28569042
PMCPMC5572351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.