Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28568507›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental toxicology2017

Biomarkers of oxidatively induced DNA damage in dreissenid mussels: A genotoxicity assessment tool for the Laurentian Great Lakes.

Pawel Jaruga, Erdem Coskun, Kimani Kimbrough, Annie Jacob, W Edward Johnson, Miral Dizdaroglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental toxicology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Standards for Quantitative Measurement of DNA Damage in Mammalian Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pawel JarugaBiomolecular Measurement Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9192-6084
Erdem CoskunBiomolecular Measurement Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899.
Kimani KimbroughNOAA's National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910.
Annie JacobConsolidated Safety Services, 10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 300 Fairfax, Virginia, 22030.
W Edward JohnsonNOAA's National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910.
Miral DizdarogluBiomolecular Measurement Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activities of fast growing human population are altering freshwater ecosystems, endangering their inhabitants and public health. Organic and trace compounds have a high potential for adverse impacts on aquatic organisms in some Great Lakes tributaries. Toxic compounds in tissues of organisms living in contaminated environments change their metabolism and alter cellular components. We measured oxidatively induced DNA damage in the soft tissues of dreissenid mussels to check on the possible contaminant-induced impact on their DNA. The animals were obtained from archived samples of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Mussel Watch Program. Mussels were collected from the harbor of Ashtabula River in Ohio, and a reference area located at the Lake Erie shore. Using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with isotope dilution, we identified and quantified numerous oxidatively modified DNA bases and 8,5'-cyclopurine-2'-deoxynucleosides. We found significant differences in the concentrations of these potentially mutagenic and/or lethal lesions in the DNA of mussels from the harbor as compared to the animals collected at the reference site. These results align NOAA's data showing that elevated concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and heavy metals were found in mussels within the harbor as compared to mussels collected in the reference site. The measured DNA lesions can be used as biomarkers for identifying DNA damage in mussels from polluted and reference sites. Such biomarkers are needed to identify the bioeffects of contaminants in affected organisms, as well as whether remedial actions have proven successful in reducing observed toxic effects.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAnimalsBiomarkersBivalviaEnvironmental MonitoringLakesMetals, HeavyMutagenicity TestsNucleosidesPolychlorinated BiphenylsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiomarkersMetals, HeavyNucleosidesPolychlorinated BiphenylsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, Chemicaldreissenid musselsGC-MS/MSGreat LakesMussel Watch Programoxidatively induced DNA damagepolychlorinated biphenylspolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonstrace metals

Identifiers

PMID28568507
PMCPMC5669367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.