Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28567607›Full record

Observational studyEndocrine2018

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in MEN1 disease: a mono-centric longitudinal and prognostic study.

S Chiloiro, F Lanza, A Bianchi, G Schinzari, M G Brizi, A Giampietro, V Rufini, F Inzani, A Giordano, G Rindi and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Endocrine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S ChiloiroDepartment of Endocrinology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
F LanzaDepartment of Radiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
A BianchiDepartment of Endocrinology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
G SchinzariDepartment of Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
M G BriziDepartment of Radiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
A GiampietroDepartment of Endocrinology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
V RufiniDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
F InzaniDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
A GiordanoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
G RindiDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
A PontecorviDepartment of Endocrinology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
L De MarinisDepartment of Endocrinology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. laurademarinis@yahoo.it.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMultiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an inherited endocrine neoplastic syndrome associated with a greater risk of endocrine tumor development like pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NET), with different clinical characteristics from sporadic ones. This paper aims to compare clinical, hystological and morphological aspects of p-NET in patients affected from MEN1 (MEN1+) and not-affected ones (MEN1-).

methodsWe performed a retrospective observational study. Data was collected between December 2010 and December 2015, including patients with a histological diagnosis of p-NET and radiological imaging. We compared clinical, histological, radiological, and prognostic aspects of MEN+ p-NET with MEN-1 p-NET.

resultsOf the 45 patients enrolled, 13 MEN1+ and 21 MEN1- cases were analyzed. Frequency of not secreting p-NETs and insulin secreting p-NETs, histopathological grades and Ki67 expression were superimposable between MEN1+ and MEN1- patients. MEN1+ pNETs are more often multicentric compared to MEN1- pNETs. Frequency of liver and nodes metastatic spread was higher in MEN1- p-NET compared to MEN1+ p-NET. Analyzing p-NET according to the disease outcome, we found that recovered and stable p-NETs in MEN1+ patients, compared to MEN1- cases, are diagnosed at lower age (p = 0.04/p = 0.002) and that are more frequently multifocal lesions (p = 0.009/p = 0.002).

conclusionsIn our study pNETs in MEN1+ and pNETs in MEN1- don't significantly differ for prognosis but only for clinical features. p-NET stage disease and prognosis can be positively influenced by early diagnosis and screening in index patients' first-degree relatives.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1Neuroendocrine TumorsPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesMEN1Neuroendocrine tumorPancreaspNET

Identifiers

PMID28567607
OpenAlexW2618401880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.