ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2017
Evaluation of outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery for pilocytic astrocytoma.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric cranial stereotactic radiosurgery: Meta-analysis and international stereotactic radiosurgery society practice guidelines.Neuro-oncology · 2025Guideline
- Unusual localization of pilocytic astrocytoma at the foramen of Monro mimicking a colloid cyst: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Survival outcomes and prognostic factors in surgically treated adult pilocytic astrocytomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- A bibliometric analysis of research trends and hotspots of pilocytic astrocytoma from 2004 to 2023.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for symptomatic eloquently deep-seated cystic pilocytic astrocytoma mural nodules: Retrospective case series of effective outcomes.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Radiosurgery outcomes in infratentorial juvenile pilocytic astrocytomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Pilocytic Astrocytoma Arising from the Conus Medullaris in an Adult: A Case Report.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2022Article
- Concise review of radiosurgery for contemporary management of pilocytic astrocytomas in children and adults.World journal of experimental medicine · 2022Review
- Concise review of stereotactic irradiation for pediatric glial neoplasms: Current concepts and future directions.World journal of methodology · 2021Review
- Recurrent adult pilocytic astrocytoma presenting with intraventricular and leptomeningeal spread.Surgical neurology international · 2021Article
- Twenty-three years follow-up after low-dose Gamma Knife surgery of a brainstem juvenile pilocytic astrocytoma: a case report and review of the literature.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pilocytic astrocytomas are rare intracranial gliomas that are typically treated with surgical extirpation. Our aim was to report the radiologic and clinical outcomes of patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pilocytic astrocytoma in the primary and salvage setting. Patients with pilocytic astrocytoma treated at a single institution with SRS from 1990 to 2015 were reviewed. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were collected and overall survival, local control, and toxicity were evaluated. Twenty-eight consecutive patients (12 females and 16 males) with a median age of 17.4 years at SRS were identified. Overall, 46% of patients were treated with SRS as part of the initial treatment course after biopsy or subtotal resection, and the remainder as a salvage therapy. The most common location was the cerebellum (28%) followed by brainstem and basal ganglia (21 and 18%, respectively). Four patients received prior external beam radiation therapy (14%). Median tumor volume was 1.84 cc (0.19-15.94 cc), and 39% had a cystic component at SRS. Prescription dose ranged from 4 to 20 Gy (median 16 Gy) to a median isodose line of 50% (range 30-100%). With a median follow-up of 5.2 years (0.3-17.1 years), all patients remained alive at last follow-up. Two patients demonstrated evidence of local radiographic progression at last follow-up (7%). No toxicity could be directly attributed to SRS. In this SRS series, durable tumor control was achieved in 93% of patients with pilocytic astrocytoma, although continued follow up will be important giving the natural history of this disease. As demonstrated, SRS is an appropriate technique in the primary and recurrent treatment of pilocytic astrocytoma that offers favorable disease control and infrequent clinical toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.