Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28567528›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2017

Portal vein embolization in extended liver resection.

Nisha Narula, Thomas A Aloia

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neoadjuvant treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Progress toward improving outcomes in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  14. Short-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Portal Vein Embolization: an ACS-NSQIP Procedure-Targeted Hepatectomy Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nisha NarulaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Herman Pressler Drive, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Thomas A AloiaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Herman Pressler Drive, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. taaloia@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver resection of benign, primary, and metastatic tumors is challenging and places patients at risk of postoperative liver insufficiency. This risk is largely dependent on the volume and function of the future liver remnant (FLR). It is, therefore, critical that hepatobiliary surgeons are well versed in the measurement of liver volume and function, as well as various techniques for preoperative liver volume augmentation. PURPOSE: This comprehensive review of portal vein embolization (PVE) begins with an overview of FLR measurement and progresses to patient factors to consider when choosing PVE and assessment of hypertrophy. PVE techniques and complications are subsequently discussed.

conclusionsThe absolute volume of FLR required to avoid postoperative liver insufficiency is dependent on the patient, disease, and anatomic factors. Rapid expansion of the FLR can be achieved with PVE of contralateral liver segments. Although multiple metrics have been used to correlate hypertrophy with postoperative outcomes after PVE, the kinetic growth rate (KGR) is the most reliable predictor of freedom from postoperative liver insufficiency. PVE is now considered a safe and effective procedure when performed at high-volume hepatobiliary centers. It is an effective tool that, by lowering the risk of liver failure, increases the number of patients who can undergo potential curative hepatectomy.

Indexed as

HepatectomyPortal VeinEmbolization, TherapeuticHumansLiver NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsChemotherapy-associated hepatotoxicityFuture liver remnantLiver cancer/metastasesPostoperative complicationsSteatosis

Identifiers

PMID28567528
OpenAlexW2617267329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.