ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2017
Application challenges of the new EU Clinical Trials Regulation.
Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol Commentary for the SUCCESS (Successful Recruitment and Retention in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Pregnant Participants with Opioid Use Disorder) Study.Substance use & addiction journal · 2025Article
- Tracking a decade of phase I clinical trials in Italy: trends and insights from national and european registries amid regulatory change.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- EU CTR 536/2014: Are We Able to Reap the Benefits by Now?Archives of Iranian medicine · 2024Article
- Implementation of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 as a Non-commercial Sponsor: An Internal Survey and a Descriptive Analysis of Timelines.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2023Article
- Patient and public involvement in research: a review of practical resources for young investigators.BMC rheumatology · 2023Review
- Rethinking the role of Research Ethics Committees in the light of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 on clinical trials and the COVID-19 pandemic.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Review
- Future of Data Analytics in the Era of the General Data Protection Regulation in Europe.PharmacoEconomics · 2020Article
- Ethical review of patient safety and public health in EU clinical trials legislation: impact of COVID-19 pandemic.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this paper is to discuss the challenges of the upcoming policy change in the field of clinical drug trials due to the shift from the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC to the new Clinical Trials Regulation 536/2014, adopted in 2014. Although it is expected that the new EU Clinical Trials Regulation will increase Europe's competitiveness in clinical research, the paper argues that some measures to assure protection of research subjects should be taken before the Regulation comes into application in 2018.
methodsThe methods used in this paper are comparative analysis of legal documents and related academic papers.
resultsThe new Regulation serves as an efficient means to harmonize the clinical drug trial evaluation procedures across the EU. However, its application also raises potential challenges regarding interests and safety of research subjects: first, due to the possibility of skipping the assessment and balancing of benefits and risks from the scope of ethical review and limiting such a review to only Part II issues of the assessment report; second, due to direct applicability of the Regulation's rather vague and too general requirements for investigator's qualifications which does not allow the assessors (ethics committees and (or) competent authorities) to introduce higher qualification requirements for the investigators conducting high-risk clinical drug trials in the national legislation.
conclusionsThere is an urgent need to raise awareness and facilitate debate on potential application challenges of the new Regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28567502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.