Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28567430›Full record

ReviewOpen forum infectious diseases2017

Can Hepatitis C Virus Antigen Testing Replace Ribonucleic Acid Polymearse Chain Reaction Analysis for Detecting Hepatitis C Virus? A Systematic Review.

Harun Khan, Andrew Hill, Janice Main, Ashley Brown, Graham Cooke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open forum infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Biomarkers in Detection of Hepatitis C Virus Infection.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Interferon-omega: Current status in clinical applications.International immunopharmacology · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harun KhanFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Andrew HillDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Liverpool University, United Kingdom.
Janice MainFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Ashley BrownFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Graham CookeFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health EME/14/02/17Department of Health RP-2016-07-012Medical Research Council MR/P025064/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complexity and cost of current diagnostics for hepatitis C virus (HCV) may act as a prevention to the scale-up of treatment in the developing world. Currently, ribonucleic acid (RNA)-polymerase chain reaction tests are the gold standard. However, there is potential for the use of simpler and cheaper antigen tests to confirm HCV infection in different clinical settings. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of antigen assays. This was compared with the reference-standard RNA assays. A subanalysis also assessed Architect core antigen test, which is the only commercially available antigen test on the market. In 24 datasets, evaluating HCV-antigen assays in 8136 samples, the percentage of HCV-antigen positive, HCV-RNA negative was 0.57%. The percentage HCV-antigen negative, HCV-RNA positive was 3.52%. There is strong evidence that antigen detection performs as well as RNA-based assays for HCV management. The use of antigen tests could improve access to HCV care in underresourced healthcare settings.

Indexed as

HCV antigenHCV diagnosticsHCV RNA.

Identifiers

PMID28567430
PMCPMC5445222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.