ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2017
Coeliac disease and the videocapsule: what have we learned till now.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Evidence on Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Celiac Disease: Systematic Review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Automated diagnosis of celiac disease by video capsule endoscopy using DAISY Descriptors.Journal of medical systems · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Celiac disease is diagnosed in part by finding areas of pathology in the small bowel (SB) mucosa. This can often be difficult because the pathologic alterations, including atrophy of the small intestinal villi, can often be sparse and subtle. Some of the quantitative methods for detecting and measuring the presence of villous atrophy from videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) images are presented and discussed. These methods consist of static features of measurement including texture, gray level, and presence and abundance of fissures contained within each acquired image. The methods also consist of dynamic measurements including spectral analysis, and determining motion from a sequence of endoscopic images as obtained from a VCE clip. Thus far, several methods have been found useful to characterize the SB mucosa of untreated celiac disease patients versus control patients lacking villous atrophy, which have revealed significant differences in texture, frequency, and motion on analysis of VCE. In untreated celiac patients undergoing endoscopy, there tends to be greater magnitude of changes and spatial differences in textural descriptors, longer periodic components, indicating slower periodic activity, and differences in feature location, suggesting alterations in motility at areas of pathology as compared to patients without villous atrophy. Improvements in the quantitative analysis of VCE imaging in celiac patients is important to detect pathology in suspected patients, so that biopsies can be obtained from pertinent regions of the small intestinal mucosa. Improvements are also necessary so that patients with celiac disease can be monitored to evaluate the progress of mucosal healing after onset of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.