ReviewGastroenterology report2017
Re-appraisal and consideration of minimally invasive surgery in colorectal cancer.
Review in Gastroenterology report, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03806244 (Prospective Study of the Feasibility of Stereotactic Navigation in Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Study of the Feasibility of Stereotactic Navigation in Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robotic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy in colon cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2024Pooled it
- Factors contributing to the utilization of robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Single-Incision vs. Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: An Update of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Interim safety analysis of the first-in-human clinical trial of the Versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- Preclinical evaluation of the newly developed carina platform in robotic-assisted proctectomy with porcine and cadaveric models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Textbook Outcome in Colorectal Surgery for Cancer: An Italian Version.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The burden of performing minimal access surgery: ergonomics survey results from 462 surgeons across Germany, the UK and the USA.Journal of robotic surgery · 2022Article
- Minimally invasive colorectal surgery learning curve.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Article
- Comparison of clinical efficacy of single-incision and traditional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Influence of surgeon specialty and volume on the utilization of minimally invasive surgery and outcomes for colorectal cancer: a retrospective review.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Robotic and laparoscopic surgical techniques in patients with Crohn's disease.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Hospital robotic use for colorectal cancer care.Journal of robotic surgery · 2021Article
- Preclinical evaluation of the versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access general and colorectal procedures.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Comparative analysis of modified Bacon operation and double stapler operation in the treatment of rectal cancer.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Transvaginal laparoscopic right colectomy for colon neoplasia.Gastroenterology report · 2020Article
- Colorectal Cancer in the Adolescent and Young Adult Population.JCO oncology practice · 2020Article
- Safe adoption of robotic colorectal surgery using structured training: early Irish experience.Journal of robotic surgery · 2019Article
- International consensus on natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer.Gastroenterology report · 2019Article
- The impact of surgeon choices on costs associated with uncomplicated minimally invasive colectomy: you are not as important as you think.Gastroenterology report · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Throughout history, surgeons have been on a quest to refine the surgical treatment options for their patients and to minimize operative trauma. During the last three decades, there have been tremendous advances in the field of minimally invasive colorectal surgery, with an explosion of different technologies and approaches offered to treat well-known diseases. Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to be equal or superior to open surgery. The boundaries of laparoscopy have been pushed further, in the form of single-incision laparoscopy, natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and robotics. This paper critically reviews the pathway of development of minimally invasive surgery, and appraises the different minimally invasive colorectal surgical approaches available to date.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.