Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28567283›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2017

Dyslipidemia management in overweight or obese adolescents: A mixed-methods clinical trial of motivational interviewing.

Nita Chahal, Janet Rush, Cedric Manlhiot, Katherine M Boydell, Ahlexxi Jelen, Brian W McCrindle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Motivational Interviewing in Pediatric Obesity: A Meta-analysis of the Effects on Behavioral Outcomes.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nita ChahalLabatt Family Heart Centre, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Janet RushFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Cedric ManlhiotLabatt Family Heart Centre, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Katherine M BoydellSchool of Psychiatry, Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ahlexxi JelenLabatt Family Heart Centre, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Brian W McCrindleLabatt Family Heart Centre, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hospital for Sick Children · CAMcMaster University · CAUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLifestyle management for dyslipidemic adolescents often occurs in the context of family-centered care, which necessitates adaptation of counseling strategies.

objectiveTo determine the effectiveness of motivational interviewing for lifestyle behavior change for dyslipidemic adolescents in a dyad with a parent versus alone.

methodsA total number of 32 adolescents were randomized 1:1 to receive a series of motivational interviewing sessions either together with a parent or alone for a 6-month intervention, with both quantitative and qualitative assessment of outcomes.

resultsBoth groups were similar at baseline. Following the intervention, there were no significant differences between groups in physical, laboratory, lifestyle or psychosocial measures, except for a reduction in dietary fats/sugars (p = 0.02) and in screen time (p = 0.02) in the alone group. When both groups were combined, significant reductions at 6 months were noted for body mass index (p < 0.001), waist circumference (p < 0.001), total cholesterol (p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.001), triglycerides (p = 0.01), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.001), fasting insulin (p = 0.01), and homeostatic model (p = 0.02). Reduced screen time and increased fruit and vegetable intake were also noted for both groups combined. These changes were also reflected in self-efficacy (p = 0.004), self-esteem (p = 0.03), and improvement in quality of life measures. Interview data provided insights into the utility and acceptability of the motivational interviewing intervention.

conclusionMotivational interviewing was an efficient strategy for inspiring healthy lifestyle and physiological changes among adolescents in both groups. Family centered pediatric approaches should consider the autonomy and individual preferences of the adolescent prior to counseling.

Indexed as

adolescentscardiovascular riskdyslipidemiahigh-density lipoprotein cholesterollow-density lipoprotein cholesterolMotivational interviewingobesityoverweighttotal cholesteroltriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID28567283
PMCPMC5438108
OpenAlexW2615308416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.