Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28567221›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2017

The Use of Contrast in Caudal Epidural Injections under Image Intensifier Guidance: Is It Necessary?

Kamil Naidoo, Sulaiman Alazzawi, Alexander Montgomery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kamil NaidooDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Sulaiman AlazzawiDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Alexander MontgomeryDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated the value of using contrast as an additional aid to confirm the accuracy of needle placement for caudal epidural injections under intraoperative image intensifier guidance.

methodsA total of 252 consecutive patients were included in this study. Their mean age was 46.7 years (range, 32 to 76 years). There were 133 males (53%) and 119 females (47%) over a 12-month period.

resultsOf the 252 consecutive procedures, the contrast enhanced image intensifier confirmed accurate needle placement on first attempt in 252 cases (100%). Needle resiting following the infiltration of contrast was required in 0 case.

conclusionsThe results from this study demonstrate that a surgeon beyond the learning curve can accurately place caudal epidural injections using image intensification only, without the use of contrast.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnesthesia, CaudalFemaleFluoroscopyHumansInjections, EpiduralMaleMiddle AgedNeedlesProspective StudiesRadiographic Image EnhancementSpineCaudal anesthesiaEpidural injectionsFluoroscopySpine

Identifiers

PMID28567221
PMCPMC5435657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.