Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28566986›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in health information managemen2017

Differences in Sociocognitive Beliefs between Involved and Noninvolved Employees during the Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System.

Nicola Esther Stanczyk, Rik Crutzen, Nikki Sewuster, Elwin Schotanus, Merijn Mulders, Henricus Paul Cremers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in health information managemen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola Esther StanczykElkerliek Hospital in the Netherlands.
Rik CrutzenMaastricht University in the Netherlands.
Nikki SewusterElkerliek Hospital in the Netherlands.
Elwin SchotanusElkerliek Hospital in the Netherlands.
Merijn MuldersElkerliek Hospital in the Netherlands.
Henricus Paul CremersElkerliek Hospital in the Netherlands.
Elkerliek Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic health records (EHRs) can improve quality and efficiency in patient care. However, the intention to work with such a new system is often relatively low among employees because the work processes of the healthcare organization may change. Involving employees in an EHR implementation may increase their beliefs and perceived capabilities concerning the new system. The current study aimed to assess the role of involvement and its effects on sociocognitive beliefs regarding the implementation of a new EHR system.

methodsThe study was performed in June 2015 among all eligible employees of a hospital in the Netherlands. Both involved and noninvolved employees were invited to complete a paper-based questionnaire concerning their sociocognitive beliefs (i.e., attitude, social influence, self-efficacy, and intention) related to the EHR implementation. Independent sample t-tests were used to assess potential differences in sociocognitive beliefs between employees who were involved in the implementation process and those who were not. Effect sizes (Cohen's

resultsA total of 359 participants completed the paper-based questionnaire and were included in the analyses. Involved employees (

conclusionInvolving employees during an EHR implementation appears to enhance employees' sociocognitive beliefs and increases their intention to work with the new system.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to ComputersAdultElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIntentionMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPerceptionSelf EfficacySocial SupportSocioeconomic Factorselectronic health recordimplementationintentionsociocognitive beliefs

Identifiers

PMID28566986
PMCPMC5430131
OpenAlexW2621457719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.