Trial reportWorld journal of gastroenterology2017
Trial report in World journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolving techniques in the endoscopic evaluation and management of pancreas cystic lesions.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Focused Review on Cyst Clinicopathological Features and Advanced Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Risk Stratification of Pancreatic Cysts With Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy.Gastro hep advances · 2022Review
- Using Endoscopic Optical Coherence Tomography to Detect and Treat Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Confocal endomicroscopy for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and international Delphi consensus report.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- Endosonographic diagnosis of advanced neoplasia in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided confocal endomicroscopy requires high-quality imaging and interpretation for diagnostic evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- Advanced diagnostics for pancreatic cysts: Confocal endomicroscopy and molecular analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Pancreatic Cysts: Diagnostic Role of EUS-Guided Microforceps Biopsy and Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2019Review
- New horizons in the endoscopic ultrasonography-based diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Review
- The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas.Visceral medicine · 2018Review
- Novel investigative modalities for evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: Does increased diagnostic accuracy justify the high costs?Endoscopy international open · 2017Article
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition: Techniques and Challenges.Journal of cytologyReview
- Factors affecting the diagnostic value of liquid-based cytology by EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the reproducibility of the
methodsIn a prospective study evaluating EUS-nCLE for evaluation of PCLs, 10 subjects underwent an
resultsA total of 10 subjects (mean age 53 ± 12 years; 5 female) with a mean PCL size of 34.8 ± 14.3 mm were enrolled. Surgical histopathology confirmed 2 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), 3 mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), 2 cystic neuroendocrine tumors (cystic-NETs), 1 serous cystadenoma (SCA), and 2 squamous lined PCLs. Characteristic
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.